← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Regression Model Selection Under General Conditions
Amaze Lusompa
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14822
98
Citation mentions
66
Cited references
5
Sections
4,977
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Jun Shao 1997 5 3 10.0 0.051 1.000 100%
2 Ker-Chau Li 1987 4 2 8.0 0.041 0.811 100%
3 Bruce E. Hansen and Jeffrey Racine 2012 3 2 6.0 0.031 0.737 100%
4 Yuying Sun and Yongmiao Hong and Tae-Hwy Lee and S... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
5 Gerda Claeskens 2016 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
6 Jie Ding and Vahid Tarokh and Yuhong Yang 2018 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
7 Chor-Yiu Sin and Halbert White 1996 4 1 8.0 0.041 0.644 100%
8 Barbara Rossi 2021 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
9 Prabir Burman and Edmond Chow and Deborah Nolan 1994 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Todd E. Clark and Michael W. McCracken 2009 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 Helmut Lu 2005 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
12 Jianhua Z. Huang and Colin O. Wu and Lan Zhou 2002 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
13 Jianhua Z. Huang and Colin O. Wu and Lan Zhou 2004 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
14 Atsushi Inoue and Lu Jin and Barbara Rossi 2017 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
15 James Stock and Mark Watson 2007 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
16 Halbert White 1981 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
17 Halbert White 1982 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
18 Halbert White 1994 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
19 Peter M. Robinson 1989 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
20 Zongwu Cai 2007 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
21 Rainer Dahlhaus 2012 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
22 Serena Ng 2013 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
23 Yuhong Yang 2005 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
24 Stephen Bates and Trevor Hastie and Robert Tibshir... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 El\'\i 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Siddhartha Chib and Todd A. Kuffner 2016 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Donald W.K. Andrews 1991 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Xinyu Zhang and Alan T.K. Wan and Guohua Zou 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 O 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Yan Gao and Xinyu Zhang and Shouyang Wang and Guoh... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Dalei Yu and Xinyu Zhang and Hua Liang 2025 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Denis Chetverikov and Zhipeng Liao and Victor Cher... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Jon Faust and Jonathan H. Wright 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Ivo Welch and Amit Goyal 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Jean Opsomer and Yuedong Wang and Yuhong Yang 2001 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Sylvain Arlot and Alain Celisse 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Bruce E. Hansen 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 C. Z. Wei 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Jose 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Xun Lu and Liangjun Su 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Whitney K. Newey and Daniel McFadden 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 S.N. Lahiri 2003 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Halbert White 2001 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 James Davidson 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Xiaohong Chen 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Jianqing Fan and Heng Peng 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Jeff Racine 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Bin Chen and Yongmiao Hong 2012 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 L. Giraitis and G. Kapetanios and T. Yates 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Liudas Giraitis and George Kapetanios and Massimil... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Jianqing Fan and Irene Gijbels 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Ker-Chau Li 1985 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Wolfgang Ha 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Jeffrey D. Hart 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Denis Heng-Yan Leung 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 Donald W. K. Andrews 1993 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Jushan Bai and Pierre Perron 1998 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Kenneth D. West 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Kenneth D. West and Michael W. McCracken 1998 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 Zongwu Cai and Ted Juhl 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
61 Leland E. Farmer and Lawrence Schmidt and Allan Ti... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
62 Kenneth P. Burnham and David R. Anderson 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
63 Serena Ng and Pierre Perron 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
64 Mark F.J. Steel 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
65 Hannes Leeb and Benedikt M. Po 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
66 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.