Citation Analysis

Evaluating Policy Effects under Network Interference without Network Information: A Transfer Learning Approach
Tadao Hoshino
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14415
83
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
11
Sections
9,632
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cai, Jing and Janvry, Alain De and Sadoulet, Elisa... 2015 10 5 15.0 0.120 1.000 100%
2 Conley, Timothy G and Gon\cc 2023 11 4 12.0 0.133 0.769 45%
3 Paluck, Elizabeth Levy and Shepherd, Hana and Aron... 2016 3 2 5.0 0.036 0.737 100%
4 Faridani, Stefan and Niehaus, Paul 2024 3 2 5.0 0.036 0.737 100%
5 Gao, Rui and Kleywegt, Anton 2023 3 2 5.0 0.036 0.737 100%
6 Fang, Zheng and Santos, Andres 2019 3 3 3.5 0.036 0.737 67%
7 Chin, Alex 2019 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 Ugander, Johan and Yin, Hao 2023 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
9 Blanchet, Jose and Murthy, Karthyek 2019 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 Duchi, John C and Namkoong, Hongseok 2021 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 Spini, Pietro Emilio 2021 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
12 Christensen, Timothy and Connault, Benjamin 2023 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
13 Kelejian, Harry H and Prucha, Ingmar R 2007 3 2 4.5 0.036 0.644 67%
14 Kim, Min Seong and Sun, Yixiao 2011 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
15 Kojevnikov, Denis 2021 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
16 Leung, Michael P 2024 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
17 Hoshino, Tadao and Yanagi, Takahide (self) 2023 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
18 Yu, Christina Lee and Airoldi, Edoardo M and Borgs... 2022 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
19 Bhattacharya, Debopam 2009 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
20 Stuart, Elizabeth A and Cole, Stephen R and Bradsh... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Hartman, Erin and Grieve, Richard and Ramsahai, Ro... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Buchanan, Ashley L and Hudgens, Michael G and Cole... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Wu, Lili and Yang, Shu 2023 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Dahabreh, Issa J and Robertson, Sarah E and Steing... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Degtiar, Irina and Rose, Sherri 2023 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Bond, Robert M and Fariss, Christopher J and Jones... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Carter, Michael and Laajaj, Rachid and Yang, Dean 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Jose Blanchet and Karthyek Murthy and Viet Anh Ngu... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Aronow, Peter M and Samii, Cyrus 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Aronow, Peter M and Eckles, Dean and Samii, Cyrus ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Miao, Xinran and Zhao, Jiwei and Kang, Hyunseung 2024 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Leung, Michael P 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Lin, Zhongjian and Xu, Haiqing 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Panaretos, Victor M and Zemel, Yoav 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Santambrogio, Filippo 2015 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Tripathi, Amitabha and Venugopalan, Sushmita and W... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Jackson, Matthew O 2008 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Albert, Re 2002 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Kolaczyk, Eric D 2009 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Li, Qi and Racine, Jeffrey S 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Andrews, Donald WK 1991 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
42 Shapiro, Alexander 1991 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.