Citation Analysis

\large\bfDynamic Spatial Treatment Effect Boundaries: \\ A Continuous Functional Framework from Navier-Stokes Equations
Tatsuru Kikuchi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14409

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,591

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Müller, U. K., & Watson, M. W	2024	7	5	12.0	0.250	0.950	86%
2	Müller, U. K., & Watson, M. W	2022	5	3	9.0	0.179	0.928	80%
3	Kikuchi, T (self)	2024a	2	2	4.0	0.071	0.644	100%
4	Anselin, L	1988	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
5	Conley, T. G	1999	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
6	Butts, K., & Gardner, J	2023	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
7	Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E	1997	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
8	Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B	2015	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
9	Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W	2017	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
10	Angrist, J. D., & Kolesár, M	2022	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
11	Deaton, A	2010	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
12	Kikuchi, T (self)	2024b	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
13	Kikuchi, T (self)	2024c	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
14	Kikuchi, T (self)	2024d	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
15	Kikuchi, T (self)	2024e	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
16	Zhdanov, V. M., & Zhdanov, R. Z	2010	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%
17	Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A	1964	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.