Citation Analysis

Denoised IPW-Lasso for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation in Randomized Experiments
Mingqian Guan, Komei Fujita, Naoya Sueishi, Shota Yasui
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10527
60
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
11
Sections
8,090
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kennedy, Edward H 2023 4 4 7.0 0.067 0.928 100%
2 Gerber, Alan S and Green, Donald P and Larimer, Ch... 2008 4 3 7.0 0.067 0.928 100%
3 Nie, Xinkun and Wager, Stefan 2021 3 3 5.0 0.050 0.843 100%
4 Bu 2011 4 2 8.0 0.067 0.811 100%
5 Ku 2019 3 2 4.0 0.050 0.737 100%
6 Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan 2018 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
7 Athey, Susan and Keleher, Niall and Spiess, Jann 2025 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
8 Diemert, Eustache and Betlei, Artem and Renaudin, ... 2018 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
9 Gutierrez, Pierre and Ge 2017 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
10 Bu 2015 2 2 2.5 0.033 0.511 50%
11 Devriendt, Floris and Van Belle, Jente and Guns, T... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.033 0.511 100%
12 Shalit, Uri and Johansson, Fredrik D and Sontag, D... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
13 Shi, Claudia and Blei, David and Veitch, Victor 2019 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
14 Tibshirani, Robert 1996 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
15 Hirano, Keisuke and Imbens, Guido W and Ridder, Ge... 2003 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
16 Fryer, Roland G., Jr. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
17 Susukida, Ryoko and Amin-Esmaeili, Masoumeh and Ba... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
18 Korkames, Joseph and Stanley, TD and Stremersch, S... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
19 Imai, Kosuke and Ratkovic, Marc 2013 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
20 Tian, Lu and Alizadeh, Ash A and Gentles, Andrew J... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
21 Freedman, David A 2008 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
22 Lin, Winston 2013 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
23 Wager, Stefan and Du, Wenfei and Taylor, Jonathan ... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
24 Guo, Yongyi and Coey, Dominic and Konutgan, Mikael... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
25 Ribeiro, Marco Tulio and Singh, Sameer and Guestri... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
26 Lundberg, Scott M and Lee, Su-In 2017 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
27 Rudin, Cynthia 2019 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
28 Slack, Dylan and Hilgard, Sophie and Jia, Emily an... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.406 100%
29 Curth, Alicia and Van der Schaar, Mihaela 2021 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
30 Knaus, Michael C and Lechner, Michael and Strittma... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
31 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
32 Yamada, Hiroshi 2017 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
33 van de Geer 2014 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
34 Chetverikov, Denis and Liao, Zhipeng and Chernozhu... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
35 Radclifte, Nicholas J and Simpson, Rob 2008 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
36 Jaskowski, Maciej and Jaroszewicz, Szymon 2012 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
37 Panagopoulos, Costas and Abrajano, Marisa A 2014 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
38 Fifield, Benjamin 2018 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
39 Niven, David 2001 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
40 Niven, David 2004 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
41 Arceneaux, Kevin and Nickerson, David W 2009 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.