← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfBoundary estimation in the regression-discontinuity design: Evidence for a merit- and need-based financial aid program
Eugenio Felipe Merlano
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09257
138
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
9
Sections
5,430
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wong, Vivian C and Steiner, Peter M and Cook, Thom... 2013 5 3 9.0 0.036 1.000 100%
2 Calonico, Sebastian and Cattaneo, Matias D and Tit... 2014 10 6 19.0 0.072 1.000 100%
3 Londoño-Vélez, Juliana and Rodríguez, Catherine an... 2020 14 7 27.0 0.101 1.000 100%
4 Hahn, Jinyong and Todd, Petra and der Klaauw, Wilb... 2001 7 4 14.0 0.051 1.000 100%
5 Zajonc, Tristan 2012 26 9 45.5 0.188 0.987 96%
6 Papay, John P and Willett, John B and Murnane, Ric... 2011 17 6 28.0 0.123 0.959 88%
7 DNP and CNC and de los Andes, Universidad 2016 4 4 8.0 0.029 0.928 100%
8 Imbens, Guido and Wager, Stefan 2019 3 3 5.0 0.022 0.843 100%
9 Castaneda, Tarsicio 2005 3 3 6.0 0.022 0.843 100%
10 Imbens, Guido W and Lemieux, Thomas 2008 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
11 Reardon, Sean F and Robinson, Joseph P 2012 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
12 Choi, Jin-young and Lee, Myoung-jae 2018 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
13 Choi, Jin-young and Lee, Myoung-jae 2018 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
14 Cattaneo, Matias D and Keele, Luke and Titiunik, R... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
15 Fan, J and Gijbels, I 1996 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
16 Imbens, Guido and Kalyanaraman, Karthik 2011 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Cattaneo, Matias D and Titiunik, Roc\'i 2020 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
18 Cattaneo, Matias D and Titiunik, Roc\'i 2016 3 1 6.0 0.022 0.585 100%
19 Cattaneo, Matias D and Escanciano, Juan Carlos 2017 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
20 Alden Cheng 2020 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
21 Juan D. Di 2023 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
22 Cook, Thomas D 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
23 Skovron, Christopher and Titiunik, Rocio 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
24 Mattei, Alessandra and Mealli, Fabrizia 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Brigham R Frandsen and Markus Frölich and Blaise M... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Harold D. Chiang and Yu-Chin Hsu and Yuya Sasaki 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Yu-Chin Hsu and Shu Shen 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Ágoston Reguly 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Yingying Dong and Arthur Lewbel 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Joshua D Angrist and Miikka Rokkanen 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Jacob, Brian A and Lefgren, Lars 2004 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Jordan D. Matsudaira 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Peter H. Egger and Georg Wamser 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Noboru Hidano and Tadao Hoshino and Ayako Sugiura 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Keele, Luke J. and Titiunik, Rocío 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Eckles, Dean and Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Wager, S... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Matias D Cattaneo and Rocío Titiunik 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Zimmer, Ron and Gill, Brian 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Papay, John P and Murnane, Richard J and Willett, ... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Ruppert, David and Wand, Matthew P 1994 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Calonico, S and Cattaneo, M D and Titiunik, R 2014 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Calonico, Sebastian and Cattaneo, Matias D and Tit... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 McCrary, Justin 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Ministerio de Educaci\'o 2016 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 de Wit, Hans and Jaramillo, Isabel Cristina and Kn... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.