Citation Analysis

Estimating Treatment Effects Under Bounded Heterogeneity
Soonwoo Kwon, Liyang Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05454
82
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
8
Sections
4,604
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Crump, R. K., V. J. Hotz, G. W. Imbens, and O. A. ... 2009 5 3 8.0 0.061 1.000 100%
2 Angrist, J. D 1998 8 4 14.0 0.098 1.000 100%
3 Armstrong, T. B. and M. Kolesar 2021 4 3 6.0 0.049 0.928 100%
4 Armstrong, T. B., M. Kolesár, and S. Kwon (self) 2023 5 4 7.5 0.061 0.928 80%
5 Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke 2009 4 2 5.0 0.049 0.811 100%
6 S\l oczy\'nski, T 2022 3 2 4.0 0.037 0.737 100%
7 de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille 2020 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 Goodman-Bacon, A 2021 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
9 Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., P. Hull, and M. Kolesar 2024 2 2 2.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 Rothe, C 2017 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 de Chaisemartin, C 2024 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
12 Armstrong, T. B. and M. Koles\'ar 2018 3 2 4.5 0.037 0.644 67%
13 Sun, L. and S. Abraham (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
14 Aizer, A., S. Eli, J. Ferrie, and A. Lleras-Muney 2016 3 1 6.0 0.037 0.585 100%
15 Donoho, D. L 1994 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
16 Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten 2020 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
17 Dobkin, C., A. Finkelstein, R. Kluender, and M. J.... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
18 Martinez-Bravo, M 2014 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Favara, G. and J. Imbs 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Michalopoulos, S. and E. Papaioannou 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Bobonis, G. J., L. R. Camara Fuertes, and R. Schwa... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Xu, G 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 D’Amour, A., P. Ding, A. Feller, L. Lei, and J. Se... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Gibbons, C. E., J. C. S. Serrato, and M. B. Urbanc... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Armstrong, T. B., P. Kline, and L. Sun (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Heiler, P. and E. Kazak 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Ma, X. and J. Wang 2020 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Sasaki, Y. and T. Ura 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Lechner, M 2008 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Athey, S., G. W. Imbens, and S. Wager 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Imbens, G. W. and J. M. Wooldridge 2009 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Poirier, A. and T. Słoczyński 2024 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Athey, S. and G. Imbens 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Davis, J. M. and S. B. Heller 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Bruns-Smith, D., O. Dukes, A. Feller, and E. L. Og... 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Li, K.-C 1982 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Masten, M. A. and A. Poirier 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Li, C. and U. K. Muller 2021 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Imbens, G. and S. Wager 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Noack, C. and C. Rothe 2024 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Sanchez-Becerra, A 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 de Chaisemartin, C. and A. Deeb 2024 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Roth, J., P. H. Sant’Anna, A. Bilinski, and J. Poe 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Low, M. G 1997 2 1 1.0 0.024 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.