Citation Analysis – Repeated Matching Games\\ An Empirical Framework

Repeated Matching Games\\ An Empirical Framework
Pauline Corblet, Jeremy Fox, Alfred Galichon
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02737

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

10,828

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Rust, J.	1987	7	4	10.0	0.078	1.000	100%
2	Choo, E. and A. Siow	2006	10	6	15.0	0.111	1.000	100%
3	Shapley, L. S. and M. Shubik	1971	10	6	14.0	0.111	0.966	90%
4	Chambolle, A. and T. Pock	2011	4	3	7.0	0.044	0.928	100%
5	Galichon, A. and B. Salanie (self)	2022	4	4	7.0	0.044	0.928	100%
6	Romeijn, H. E. and R. L. Smith	1998	10	2	20.0	0.111	0.874	100%
7	Chiappori, P.-A., B. Salanie, and Y. Weiss	2017	3	3	5.0	0.033	0.843	100%
8	Becker, G. S.	1973	3	2	4.0	0.033	0.737	100%
9	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---	2018	3	2	4.0	0.033	0.737	100%
10	Su, C.-L. and K. L. Judd	2012	2	2	4.0	0.022	0.644	100%
11	Stokey, N. L., R. E. Lucas, and E. C. Prescott	1989	2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
12	Aliprantis, C. D. and K. C. Border	2006	2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
13	Gale, D.	1989	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
14	Koopmans, T. C. and M. Beckmann	1957	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
15	Lazear, E. P.	2009	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
16	Miller, R. A.	1984	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
17	Wolpin, K. I.	1984	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
18	Pakes, A.	1986	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Rosaia, N.	2021	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	Choo, E.	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	Erlinger, A., R. J. McCann, X. Shi, A. Siow, and R...	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	McCann, R. J., X. Shi, A. Siow, and R. Wolthoff	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	Peski, M.	2021	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Gillingham, K., F. Iskhakov, A. Munk-Nielsen, J. R...	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Anderson, A. and L. Smith	2010	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Burdett, K. and D. T. Mortensen	1998	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27	Shimer, R. and L. Smith	2000	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Atakan, A. E.	2006	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Hatfield, J. W., S. D. Kominers, A. Nichifor, M. O...	2013	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30			1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Dupuy, A. and A. Galichon (self)	2014	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Fox, J., C. Yang, and D. H. Hsu (self)	2018	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Luc, D. T. and M. Volle	2021	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Johnson, S. G.	2007	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
35	Kraft, D.	1994	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Fang, H.-r. and Y. Saad	2009	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
37	Walker, H. and P. Ni	2011	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
38	Dube, J.-P., J. T. Fox, and C.-L. Su (self)	2012	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
39	Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes	1995	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
40	Fox, J. T. (self)	2009	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
41	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---		1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
42	---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---		1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Rust, J.

1987

10.0

0.078

1.000

100%

Choo, E. and A. Siow

2006

15.0

0.111

1.000

100%

Shapley, L. S. and M. Shubik

1971

14.0

0.111

0.966

90%

Chambolle, A. and T. Pock

2011

7.0

0.044

0.928

100%

Galichon, A. and B. Salanie (self)

2022

7.0

0.044

0.928

100%

Romeijn, H. E. and R. L. Smith

1998

20.0

0.111

0.874

100%

Chiappori, P.-A., B. Salanie, and Y. Weiss

2017

5.0

0.033

0.843

100%

Becker, G. S.

1973

4.0

0.033

0.737

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2018

4.0

0.033

0.737

100%

Su, C.-L. and K. L. Judd

2012

4.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Stokey, N. L., R. E. Lucas, and E. C. Prescott

1989

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Aliprantis, C. D. and K. C. Border

2006

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Gale, D.

1989

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Koopmans, T. C. and M. Beckmann

1957

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Lazear, E. P.

2009

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Miller, R. A.

1984

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Wolpin, K. I.

1984

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Pakes, A.

1986

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Rosaia, N.

2021

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Choo, E.

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Erlinger, A., R. J. McCann, X. Shi, A. Siow, and R...

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

McCann, R. J., X. Shi, A. Siow, and R. Wolthoff

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Peski, M.

2021

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Gillingham, K., F. Iskhakov, A. Munk-Nielsen, J. R...

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Anderson, A. and L. Smith

2010

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Burdett, K. and D. T. Mortensen

1998

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Shimer, R. and L. Smith

2000

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Atakan, A. E.

2006

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hatfield, J. W., S. D. Kominers, A. Nichifor, M. O...

2013

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dupuy, A. and A. Galichon (self)

2014

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fox, J., C. Yang, and D. H. Hsu (self)

2018

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Luc, D. T. and M. Volle

2021

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Johnson, S. G.

2007

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Kraft, D.

1994

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fang, H.-r. and Y. Saad

2009

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Walker, H. and P. Ni

2011

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dube, J.-P., J. T. Fox, and C.-L. Su (self)

2012

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes

1995

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fox, J. T. (self)

2009

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.