Citation Analysis

Triadic Network Formation%
Chris Muris, Cavit Pakel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26420

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,534

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	9	8	13.0	0.150	0.920	78%
2	7	5	9.0	0.117	0.894	71%
3	16	9	17.5	0.267	0.826	56%
4	2	2	3.0	0.033	0.644	100%
5	2	1	4.0	0.033	0.511	100%
6	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
7	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
8	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
9	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
10	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
11	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
12	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
13	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
14	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
15	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
16	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
17	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
18	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
19	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
20	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
21	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
22	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
23	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
24	1	1	1.0	0.017	0.406	100%
25	1	1	2.0	0.017	0.406	100%
26	1	1	2.0	0.017	0.406	100%
27	1	1	0.5	0.017	0.087	0%
28	1	1	0.5	0.017	0.087	0%
29	1	1	0.5	0.017	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.