← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Telecare on the Length of Stay in Hospital\protect
Kevin Momanyi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22706
87
Citation mentions
65
Cited references
9
Sections
5,673
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, ... 2013 5 2 5.0 0.057 0.874 100%
2 Henderson, C., Knapp, M., Fernandez, J., Beecham, ... 2014 3 2 3.0 0.034 0.737 100%
3 McLeod, L. 2011 3 2 4.0 0.034 0.737 100%
4 Terza, J., Basu, A. and Rathouz, P. 2008 3 2 5.0 0.034 0.737 100%
5 Vella, F. 1992 3 2 6.0 0.034 0.737 100%
6 Fernandez, J-L., McGuire, A., Raikou, M. 2018 2 2 2.0 0.023 0.644 100%
7 Momanyi, K. (self) 2019 2 2 2.0 0.023 0.644 100%
8 Hirani, P., Beynon, M., Cartwright, M., Rixon, L.,... 2013 2 2 2.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Long, J.S and Freese, J. 2006 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 Lloyd, S. 2007 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
11 Grogger, J. and Carson, R. 1991 3 1 6.0 0.034 0.585 100%
12 Agboado, G., Peters, J., Donkin, L. 2012 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
13 Atkins, D., Baldwin, S., Zheng, C., Gallop, R., Ne... 2013 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
14 McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. 1989 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
15 Barlow, J., Singh, D., Bayer, S., Curry, R. 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Brownsell, S., Blackburn, S., Hawley, M. 2008 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Clark, R., Inglis, S., McAlister, F., Cleland, J.,... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Giordano, S., Clark, M and Goodwin, N. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Kjerstad, E. and Tuntland, H. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Parsons, JG., Sheridan, N., Rouse, P., Robinson, E... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Lewin, G., De San Miguel, K., Hendrie, D. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Jones, K., Curtis, L., Arksey, H., Forder, J., Gle... 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Almashrafi, A., Alsabti, H., Mukaddirov, M., Balan... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Steel, D. and Cylus, J. 2012 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Dulworth, S. and Pyenson, B. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Angelis, G., Murthy, A., Beyersmam, J., Harbath, S... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Andersen, R. and Newman, J. 1973 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Andersen, R. 1995 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Brown, L., Abello, A., Thurecht, L. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Heinz, S., Milliken, S. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Keistinen, T., Vilkman, S., Tuuponen, T. 1996 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Saynajakangas, O., Kinnunen, T., Tuuponen, T. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Liu, Y., Phillips, M. and Codde, J. 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Doughty, T., Shurr, J., Brewer, J. and Kubik, S. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Akematsu, Y., Nitta, S., Morita, K., Tsuji, M. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Akematsu, Y. and Tsuji, M. 2012b 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Grossman, M. 1972 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Banerjee, AV. and Maskin, E. 1996 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Serrano, R. and Volij, O. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Samuelson, P. 1938 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Houthakker, HS. 1950 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Varian, Hal R. 1982 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Karazsia, B. and VanDulmen, M. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Zou, G. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Chipeta, M., Ngwira, B., Simonga, C., Kazembe, L. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Atkins, D. and Gallop, R. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Turner, H. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Rosenbaum, R. and Rubin, D. 1983 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Hill, J. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Murray, M. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Pokropek, A. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Scottish Government 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., Renault, E. 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Heckman, J. 1979 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Olsen, R. 1980 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Winklemann, R. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Rafferty, A., Walthery, P. and King-Hele, S. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Tchetgen, R. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Petrin, A., Train, K. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Mwabu, G. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
61 Awiti, J. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
62 Echevin, D. and Fortin, B. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
63 Martin, S. and Smith, P. 1996 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 Fenn, P. and Davies, P. 1990 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
65 Nawata, K., Nitta, A., Watanabe, S and Kawabuchi, ... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.