Citation Analysis – Identification and Estimation of Seller Risk Aversion in Ascending Auctions

Identification and Estimation of Seller Risk Aversion in Ascending Auctions
Nathalie Gimenes, Tonghui Qi, Sorawoot Srisuma
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19945

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

14,005

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Gimenes, N (self)	2017	9	4	12.5	0.106	1.000	100%
2	Chen, X., Linton, O., and van Keilegom, I	2003	3	2	5.0	0.035	0.737	100%
3	Myerson, R. B	1981	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
4	Marmer, V. and Shneyerov, A	2012	2	2	1.5	0.024	0.644	100%
5	Koenker, R. and Bassett, G	1978	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
6	Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q	2009	2	2	1.5	0.024	0.644	100%
7	Newey, W. K	1994	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
8	Athey, S. and Haile, P. A	2002	2	2	2.5	0.024	0.644	100%
9	Krasnokutskaya, E	2011	2	2	1.5	0.024	0.644	100%
10	Marmer, V., Shneyerov, A., and Xu, P	2013	2	2	1.5	0.024	0.644	100%
11	Elyakime, B., Laffont, J. J., Loisel, P., and Vuon...	1994	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
12	Andreyanov, P. and Caoui, E. H	2022	2	2	3.0	0.024	0.644	100%
13	Lu, J. and Perrigne, I	2008	2	1	1.0	0.024	0.511	100%
14	Campo, S., Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q	2011	2	1	1.0	0.024	0.511	100%
15	Sundararajan, M. and Yan, Q	2020	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
16	Waehrer, K., Harstad, R. M., and Rothkopf, M. H	2011	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
17	Moreno, D. and Wooders, J	2017	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
18	Haile, P, Hong, H, and Shum, M	2003	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
19	Guerre, E. and Sabbah, C	2012	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
20	Fan, J	1992	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
21	Koenker, R, Leorato, S, and Peracchi, F	2013	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
22	Li, T., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q	2003	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
23	Andrews, D. W	1994	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
24	Ichimura, H. and Lee, S	2010	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
25	McAfee, R. P. and Vincent, D	1992	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
26	Paarsch, H. J	1997	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
27	McAfee, R. P., Quan, D. C., and Vincent, D. R	2002	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
28	Haile, P. A. and Tamer, E	2003	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
29	Tang, X	2011	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
30	Maskin, E. and Riley, J	1984	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
31	Matthews, S	1987	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
32	Hu, A., Matthews, S. A., and Zou, L	2010	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
33	Li, T., Lu, J., and Zhao, L	2015	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
34	Zincenko, F	2018	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
35	Grundl, S. and Zhu, Y	2019	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
36	Jun, S. J. and Zincenko, F	2022	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
37	Paarsch, H. J	1992	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
38	Laffont, J.-J., Ossard, H., and Vuong, Q	1995	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
39	Athey, S. and Levin, J	2001	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
40	Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q	2000	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
41	Enache, A. and Florens, J.-P	2017	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
42	Liu, N. and Luo, Y	2017	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
43	Luo, Y. and Wan, Y	2018	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
44	Ma, J., Marmer, V., and Shneyerov, A	2019	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
45	Rezende, L	2008	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
46	Gimenes, N. and Guerre, E (self)	2022	1	1	0.5	0.012	0.406	100%
47	Aradillas-Lopez, A., Gandhi, A., and Quint, D	2013	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
48	Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., Green, J. R., et ...	1995	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
49	Fan, J. and Gijbels, I	1996	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
50	Koenker, R	2005	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
51	van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A	2023	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
52	Dom\'\inguez, M. A. and Lobato, I. N	2004	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
53	Ross, S. A	1981	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
54	Andrews, D. W	2001	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
55	Newey, W. K. and McFadden, D	1994	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
56	Levin, D. and Smith, J. L	1994	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
57	Levin, D. and Smith, J. L	1996	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
58	Hu, A., Matthews, S. A., and Zou, L	2019	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
59	Hu, Y., McAdams, D., and Shum, M	2013	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
60	Luo, Y. and Xiao, R	2023	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
61	Gentry, M. and Li, T	2014	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
62	Chen, X., Gentry, M. L., Li, T., and Lu, J	2025	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
63	Gimenes, N. and Guerre, E (self)	2020	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Gimenes, N (self)

2017

12.5

0.106

1.000

100%

Chen, X., Linton, O., and van Keilegom, I

2003

5.0

0.035

0.737

100%

Myerson, R. B

1981

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Marmer, V. and Shneyerov, A

2012

1.5

0.024

0.644

100%

Koenker, R. and Bassett, G

1978

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q

2009

1.5

0.024

0.644

100%

Newey, W. K

1994

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Athey, S. and Haile, P. A

2002

2.5

0.024

0.644

100%

Krasnokutskaya, E

2011

1.5

0.024

0.644

100%

Marmer, V., Shneyerov, A., and Xu, P

2013

1.5

0.024

0.644

100%

Elyakime, B., Laffont, J. J., Loisel, P., and Vuon...

1994

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Andreyanov, P. and Caoui, E. H

2022

3.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Lu, J. and Perrigne, I

2008

1.0

0.024

0.511

100%

Campo, S., Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q

2011

1.0

0.024

0.511

100%

Sundararajan, M. and Yan, Q

2020

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Waehrer, K., Harstad, R. M., and Rothkopf, M. H

2011

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Moreno, D. and Wooders, J

2017

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Haile, P, Hong, H, and Shum, M

2003

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Guerre, E. and Sabbah, C

2012

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Fan, J

1992

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Koenker, R, Leorato, S, and Peracchi, F

2013

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Li, T., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q

2003

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. W

1994

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Ichimura, H. and Lee, S

2010

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

McAfee, R. P. and Vincent, D

1992

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Paarsch, H. J

1997

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

McAfee, R. P., Quan, D. C., and Vincent, D. R

2002

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Haile, P. A. and Tamer, E

2003

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Tang, X

2011

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Maskin, E. and Riley, J

1984

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Matthews, S

1987

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hu, A., Matthews, S. A., and Zou, L

2010

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Li, T., Lu, J., and Zhao, L

2015

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Zincenko, F

2018

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Grundl, S. and Zhu, Y

2019

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Jun, S. J. and Zincenko, F

2022

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Paarsch, H. J

1992

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Laffont, J.-J., Ossard, H., and Vuong, Q

1995

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Athey, S. and Levin, J

2001

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., and Vuong, Q

2000

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Enache, A. and Florens, J.-P

2017

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Liu, N. and Luo, Y

2017

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Luo, Y. and Wan, Y

2018

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Ma, J., Marmer, V., and Shneyerov, A

2019

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Rezende, L

2008

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Gimenes, N. and Guerre, E (self)

2022

0.5

0.012

0.406

100%

Aradillas-Lopez, A., Gandhi, A., and Quint, D

2013

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., Green, J. R., et ...

1995

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Fan, J. and Gijbels, I

1996

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Koenker, R

2005

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A

2023

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Dom\'\inguez, M. A. and Lobato, I. N

2004

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Ross, S. A

1981

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. W

2001

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K. and McFadden, D

1994

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Levin, D. and Smith, J. L

1994

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Levin, D. and Smith, J. L

1996

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hu, A., Matthews, S. A., and Zou, L

2019

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hu, Y., McAdams, D., and Shum, M

2013

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Luo, Y. and Xiao, R

2023

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Gentry, M. and Li, T

2014

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Chen, X., Gentry, M. L., Li, T., and Lu, J

2025

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Gimenes, N. and Guerre, E (self)

2020

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.