← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfFiltering amplitude dependence of correlation dynamics in complex systems: application to the cryptocurrency market
Marcin Wątorek, Marija Bezbradica, Martin Crane, Jarosław Kwapień, Stanisław Drożdż
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18820
165
Citation mentions
114
Cited references
6
Sections
6,505
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 J. Kwapie\'n and P. O\'swi\ke 2015 5 2 8.0 0.030 0.874 100%
2 J. Kwapie\'n and P. O\'swi\ke 2017 7 2 9.0 0.042 0.874 100%
3 J. Kwapie\'n 2012 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
4 Rosario N. Mantegna 1999 3 2 4.0 0.018 0.737 100%
5 Jan W. Kantelhardt and Stephan A. Zschiegner and E... 2002 3 2 5.0 0.018 0.737 100%
6 P. O\'swi\ke 2014 3 2 5.0 0.018 0.737 100%
7 3 3 4.5 0.018 0.737 67%
8 S. Dro\.zd\.z and P. O\'swi\ke 2015 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
9 M. W\ka 2021 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
10 Prim, Robert Clay 1957 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
11 Kruskal, Joseph B 1956 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
12 Wei-Xing Zhou 2008 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
13 Gang Jin Wang and Chi Xie and Yi Jun Chen and Shou... 2013 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
14 M. W\ka 2021 3 1 3.0 0.018 0.585 100%
15 Darko Stosic and Dusan Stosic and Teresa B. Luderm... 2018 3 1 3.0 0.018 0.585 100%
16 Damian Zięba and Ryszard Kokoszczyński and Katarzy... 2019 3 1 3.0 0.018 0.585 100%
17 Jung Yoon Song and Woojin Chang and Jae Wook Song 2019 3 1 3.0 0.018 0.585 100%
18 J. Kwapie\'n 2021 3 1 3.0 0.018 0.585 100%
19 S. Dro\.zd\.z and Robert G\ke 2018 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
20 Thomas Conlon and Richard McGee 2020 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
21 M. W\ka 2023 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
22 Antonio Briola and Tomaso Aste 2022 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
23 S. Dro\.zd\.z and J. Kwapie\'n 2020 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
24 Ruixue Jing and Luis E.C. Rocha 2023 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
25 J. P. Onnela and K. Kaski and J. Kertész 2004 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
26 J. Kwapie\'n 2009 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
27 M Tumminello and T Aste and T Di Matteo and R N Ma... 2005 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
28 Mariana Durcheva and Pavel Tsankov 2019 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
29 Carlos Jaureguizar Francés and Pilar Grau-Carles a... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
30 Kirill Polovnikov and Vlad Kazakov and Sergey Synt... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
31 Nawee Jaroonchokanan and Amit Sinha and Sujin Suwa... 2025 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
32 Francesco Maria De Collibus and Carlo Campajola an... 2024 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
33 Longfeng Zhao and Wei Li and Andrea Fenu and Boris... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
34 P.W. Anderson 1972 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Mitchell, Melanie 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Barral, Julien and Peyrie 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Tomaso Aste 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Schar, Fabian and Berentsen, Aleksander 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Shaen Corbet and Brian Lucey and Andrew Urquhart a... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Shaen Corbet and Yang (Greg) Hou and Yang Hu and C... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Stjepan Begušić and Zvonko Kostanjčar and H. Eugen... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Tetsuya Takaishi 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Stavros Stavroyiannis and Vassilios Babalos and St... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Kwapie\'n 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 J. Kwapie\'n 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Xavier Brouty and Matthieu Garcin 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Ahmet Sensoy 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Tetsuya Takaishi and Takanori Adachi 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Shinji Kakinaka and Ken Umeno 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Nick James 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Nick James and Max Menzies and Jennifer Chan 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Yue-Jun Zhang and Elie Bouri and Rangan Gupta and ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Elmelki, Anas and Cha\^a 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Jiang-Cheng Li and Yi-Zhen Xu and Chen Tao and Gua... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Sangyup Choi and Junhyeok Shin 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Nick James and Max Menzies and Kevin Chin 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Nguyen, An Pham Ngoc and Crane, Martin and Conlon,... (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Wu, Ke and Wheatley, Spencer and Sornette, Didier 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Kun Duan and Yanqi Zhao and Andrew Urquhart and Yi... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Nguyen, An Pham Ngoc and Mai, Tai Tan and Bezbradi... (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 P. R. L. Alves 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Purba Bhattacherjee and Sibanjan Mishra and Sang H... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Elie Bouri and Soufiane Benbachir and Marwane El A... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Fan Zhou and Wenjing Guo 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Nick James and Max Menzies 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Nick James 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Lifu Jin and Bo Zheng and Xiongfei Jiang and Long ... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Mehmet Eryiǧit and Resul Eryiǧit 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Mi Yeon Hong and Ji Won Yoon 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Guido Previde Massara and T. Di Matteo and Tomaso ... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Tristan Millington 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Vladimir Boginski and Sergiy Butenko and Panos M. ... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Wei Qiang Huang and Xin Tian Zhuang and Shuang Yao 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Chi K. Tse and Jing Liu and Francis C.M. Lau 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 James, Nick and Menzies, Max and Chan, Jennifer 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Nick James and Max Menzies and Lamiae Azizi and Je... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 N. Vandewalle and F. Brisbois and X. Tordoir 2001 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Sergei Maslov 2001 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 R. Coelho and S. Hutzler and P. Repetowicz and P. ... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Maman A. Djauhari 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 Doobae Jun and Seoyoung Oh and Gwangil Kim 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
82 M. Wiliński and A. Sienkiewicz and T. Gubiec and R... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
83 Miśkiewicz, Janusz and Bonarska-Kujawa, Dorota 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
84 Mark McDonald and Omer Suleman and Stacy Williams ... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
85 A. Z. Górski and S. Drozdz and J. Kwapie\'n 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
86 Gang Jin Wang and Chi Xie and Feng Han and Bo Sun 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
87 G\ke 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
88 Bing Li and Zefang Liao 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
89 Ditian Zhang and Yangyang Zhuang and Pan Tang and ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
90 Paweł Sieczka and Janusz A. Hołyst 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
91 David Matesanz and Benno Torgler and Germán Dabat ... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
92 Yan-Ran Ma and Qiang Ji and Fei Wu and Jiaofeng Pa... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
93 Nicolas S. Magner and Nicolás Hardy and Jaime Lavi... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
94 M. W\ka 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
95 C.-K Peng and S V Buldyrev and S Havtin and M Simo... 1994 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
96 Boris Podobnik and H. Eugene Stanley 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
97 Min Lin and Longfeng Zhao and Yanjin Li 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
98 P. O\'swi\ke 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
99 Zhi-Qiang Jiang and Wen-Jie Xie and Wei-Xing Zhou ... 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
100 G.F. Zebende 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
101 Paul Embrechts and Claudia Klu 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
102 Gopikrishnan, Parameswaran and Meyer, Martin and A... 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
103 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
104 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
105 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
106 Pawe\l 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
107 Antonio Briola and David Vidal-Tomás and Yuanrong ... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
108 Koutra, Danai and Shah, Neil and Vogelstein, Joshu... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
109 Monnig, Nathan D and Meyer, Fran\cc 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
110 Vasiliki Plerou and Parameswaran Gopikrishnan and ... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
111 Rama Cont 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
112 Marcel Ausloos 2000 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
113 Ryszard Kutner and Filip Świtała 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
114 S. Dro\.zd\.z and J. Kwapie\'n 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.