Citation Analysis – On the Identification of Diagnostic Expectations: Econometric Insights from DSGE Models

On the Identification of Diagnostic Expectations: Econometric Insights from DSGE Models
Jinting Guo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08472

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

9,073

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, and A. Shleifer	2018	6	3	10.0	0.061	1.000	100%
2	L’Huillier, J.-P., S. R. Singh, and D. Yoo	2024	27	12	53.0	0.276	1.000	100%
3	Qu, Z. and D. Tkachenko	2012	5	3	9.0	0.051	1.000	100%
4	Qu, Z. and D. Tkachenko	2017	16	7	28.0	0.163	0.979	94%
5	Qu, Z. and D. Tkachenko	2023	4	3	8.0	0.041	0.928	100%
6	Herbst, E. and F. Schorfheide	2014	4	2	8.0	0.041	0.811	100%
7	Lubik, T. A. and F. Schorfheide	2004	3	2	6.0	0.031	0.737	100%
8	Blanchard, O. J., J.-P. L'Huillier, and G. Lorenzo...	2013	3	2	6.0	0.031	0.737	100%
9	Iskrev, N	2010	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
10	An, S. and F. Schorfheide	2007	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
11	Cai, M., M. Del Negro, E. Herbst, E. Matlin, R. Sa...	2021	2	1	4.0	0.020	0.511	100%
12	Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky	1972	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
13	Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, Y. Ma, and A. Shleifer	2020	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
14	Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, S. Y. Kwon, and A. Shle...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
15	Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, A. Shleifer, and S. J. ...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
16	Guo, J., Y. Luo, and P. Yin (self)	2023	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
17	Bianchi, F., C. Ilut, and H. Saijo	2024a	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
18	Na, S. and D. Yoo	2025	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
19	Bianchi, F., C. L. Ilut, and H. Saijo	2024b	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
20	Canova, F. and L. Sala	2009	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
21	Komunjer, I. and S. Ng	2011	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
22	Koop, G., M. H. Pesaran, and R. P. Smith	2013	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
23	Koci\kecki, A. and M. Kolasa	2023	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	Sims, C. A	2002	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	Lubik, T. A. and F. Schorfheide	2003	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Smets, F. and R. Wouters	2007	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	Del Negro, M. and F. Schorfheide	2008	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	Schorfheide, F	2008	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	Nakamura, E. and J. Steinsson	2014	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	Gal\'\i, J	2015	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Jones, C., M. Kulish, and J. P. Nicolini	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	Hazell, J., J. Herreno, E. Nakamura, and J. Steins...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	Anderson, G. S	2008	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	Planas, C., M. Ratto, and A. Rossi	2015	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Herbst, E. P. and F. Schorfheide	2016	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, and A. Shleifer

2018

10.0

0.061

1.000

100%

L’Huillier, J.-P., S. R. Singh, and D. Yoo

2024

53.0

0.276

1.000

100%

Qu, Z. and D. Tkachenko

2012

9.0

0.051

1.000

100%

Qu, Z. and D. Tkachenko

2017

28.0

0.163

0.979

94%

Qu, Z. and D. Tkachenko

2023

8.0

0.041

0.928

100%

Herbst, E. and F. Schorfheide

2014

8.0

0.041

0.811

100%

Lubik, T. A. and F. Schorfheide

2004

6.0

0.031

0.737

100%

Blanchard, O. J., J.-P. L'Huillier, and G. Lorenzo...

2013

6.0

0.031

0.737

100%

Iskrev, N

2010

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

An, S. and F. Schorfheide

2007

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Cai, M., M. Del Negro, E. Herbst, E. Matlin, R. Sa...

2021

4.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky

1972

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, Y. Ma, and A. Shleifer

2020

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, S. Y. Kwon, and A. Shle...

2021

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, A. Shleifer, and S. J. ...

2021

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Guo, J., Y. Luo, and P. Yin (self)

2023

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bianchi, F., C. Ilut, and H. Saijo

2024a

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Na, S. and D. Yoo

2025

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bianchi, F., C. L. Ilut, and H. Saijo

2024b

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Canova, F. and L. Sala

2009

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Komunjer, I. and S. Ng

2011

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Koop, G., M. H. Pesaran, and R. P. Smith

2013

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Koci\kecki, A. and M. Kolasa

2023

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Sims, C. A

2002

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Lubik, T. A. and F. Schorfheide

2003

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Smets, F. and R. Wouters

2007

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Del Negro, M. and F. Schorfheide

2008

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Schorfheide, F

2008

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Nakamura, E. and J. Steinsson

2014

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Gal\'\i, J

2015

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Jones, C., M. Kulish, and J. P. Nicolini

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Hazell, J., J. Herreno, E. Nakamura, and J. Steins...

2022

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Anderson, G. S

2008

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Planas, C., M. Ratto, and A. Rossi

2015

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Herbst, E. P. and F. Schorfheide

2016

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.