Citation Analysis

Chaotic Bayesian Inference: Strange Attractors as Risk Models for Black Swan Events
Crystal Rust
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08183
6
Citation mentions
6
Cited references
13
Sections
2,366
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Taleb, Nassim Nicholas 2007 1 1 2.0 0.167 0.406 100%
2 Embrechts, Paul, Klüppelberg, Claudia, & Mikosch, ... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.167 0.406 100%
3 Coles, Stuart 2001 1 1 2.0 0.167 0.406 100%
4 Bollerslev, Tim 1986 1 1 2.0 0.167 0.406 100%
5 Gatheral, Jim, Jaisson, Thibault, & Rosenbaum, Mat... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.167 0.406 100%
6 Baumol, William J. & Benhabib, Jess 1989 1 1 2.0 0.167 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.