← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Polynomial Log-Marginals and Tweedie's Formula \\ When Is Bayes Possible?
Jyotishka Datta, Nicholas G. Polson
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05823
100
Citation mentions
48
Cited references
5
Sections
3,739
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Efron, Bradley 2011 14 5 28.0 0.140 1.000 100%
2 Robbins, Herbert 1956 7 3 14.0 0.070 1.000 100%
3 Koenker, Roger and Mizera, Ivan 2014 11 5 22.0 0.110 1.000 100%
4 Ritov, Ya’acov 2024 4 4 8.0 0.040 0.928 100%
5 Kiefer, Jack and Wolfowitz, Jacob 1956 3 2 6.0 0.030 0.737 100%
6 Jiang, Wenhua and Zhang, Cun-Hui 2009 3 2 6.0 0.030 0.737 100%
7 Hirschman, Isidore Isaac and Widder, David Vernon 1955 3 2 6.0 0.030 0.737 100%
8 Ghosh, Sulagna and Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Koehle... 2025 3 2 6.0 0.030 0.737 100%
9 Efron, Bradley 2012 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Efron, Bradley 2014 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 Michael West 1982 3 1 6.0 0.030 0.585 100%
12 Herbert Robbins 1951 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.511 50%
13 Stein, Charles 1956 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
14 Zhang, Cun-Hui 2003 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
15 Polson, Nicholas G (self) 1991 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
16 Brown, Lawrence D and Greenshtein, Eitan 2009 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
17 Saha, Sujayam and Guntuboyina, Adityanand 2020 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
18 Greenshtein, Eitan and Ritov, Ya’acov 2022 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
19 Bryc, W\l 1995 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
20 Neyman, Jerzy 1962 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Efron, Bradley 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Simon, Noah and Simon, Richard 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Wager, Stefan 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Laird, Nan 1978 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Dyson, Frank 1926 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Masreliez, C 1975 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Brown, Lawrence D and Greenshtein, Eitan and Ritov... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Datta, Jyotishka and Dunson, David B (self) 2016 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Polson, Nicholas G and Sun, Lei (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Stein, Charles M 1981 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Bhadra, Anindya and Datta, Jyotishka and Li, Yunfa... (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Hyva 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Gu, Jiaying and Koenker, Roger 2016 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Koenker, Roger and Gu, Jiaying 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Efron, Bradley 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Grundy, P. M. 1956 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Allan R. Sampson 1975 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Michael Goldstein 1975 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Michael Goldstein 1977 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Ahlfors, Lars V. 1979 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Lukacs, Eugene 1970 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Marcinkiewicz, J. 1939 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Crame 1936 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Feller, William 1971 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Strawderman, William E 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.