Citation Analysis

The exact distribution of the conditional likelihood-ratio test in instrumental variables regression
Malte Londschien
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04144

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

2,241

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Kleibergen, F	2007	15	6	29.0	0.429	1.000	100%
2	Londschien, M (self)	2025	5	4	9.0	0.143	1.000	100%
3	Moreira, M. J	2003	6	2	10.0	0.171	0.874	100%
4	Staiger, D. O. and J. H. Stock	1997	3	2	4.0	0.086	0.737	100%
5	Londschien, M. and P. Buhlmann (self)	2024	2	2	3.0	0.057	0.644	100%
6	Anderson, T. W	1951	1	1	1.0	0.029	0.406	100%
7	Kleibergen, F	2002	1	1	1.0	0.029	0.406	100%
8	Hillier, G	2009	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
9	Kleibergen, F	2021	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.