Citation Analysis

Selecting the Best Arm in One-Shot Multi-Arm RCTs:\\ The Asymptotic Minimax-Regret Decision Framework \\ for the Best-Population Selection Problem
Joonhwi Joo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03796
83
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
9
Sections
6,023
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Keisuke Hirano and Jack R. Porter 2009 5 3 5.0 0.060 1.000 100%
2 Aleskey Tetenov 2012 6 3 9.5 0.072 1.000 100%
3 Joonhwi Joo and Khai X. Chiong (self) Forthcoming 5 2 9.0 0.060 0.874 100%
4 J\"o 2009 3 3 3.5 0.036 0.843 100%
5 J\"o 2012 3 3 3.5 0.036 0.843 100%
6 Aad W. van der Vaart 1998 4 2 6.5 0.048 0.737 75%
7 Friedrich Liese and Klaus-J. Miescke 2008 6 4 6.0 0.072 0.693 33%
8 Charles F. Manski 2004 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
9 Toru Kitagawa and Sokbae Lee and Chen Qiu 2023 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.644 100%
10 David Blackwell and M.A. Girshick 1954 3 2 3.0 0.036 0.511 33%
11 James O. Berger 1985 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
12 Samuel Karlin and Herman Rubin 1956 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
13 Charles F. Manski and Aleksey Tetenov 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Charles F. Manski 2019 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Charles F. Manski 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 Yuchen Hu and Henri Zhu and Emma Brunskill and Ste... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Abraham Wald 1945 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Bahadur, Raghu Raj 1950 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Bahadur, Raghu Raj and Goodman, Leo A 1952 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Lehmann, E. L. 1966 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Eaton, Morris L 1967 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Dhariyal, Ishwari D and Misra, Neeraj 1994 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Matthew A. Masten 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Abughalous, Mansour M and Bansal, Naveen K 1995 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Bechhofer, Robert E 1954 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Somerville, Paul N 1954 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Jean-Yves Audibert and S'e 2010 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Kevin Jamieson and Robert Nowak 2014 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Garivier, Aure 2016 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Kaufmann, Emilie and Cappe 2016 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Grover, Aditya and Markov, Todor and Attia, Peter ... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Agrawal, Shubhada and Juneja, Sandeep and Glynn, P... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Daniel Russo 2020 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Komiyama, Junpei and Ariu, Kaito and Kato, Masahir... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Steven R. Howard and Aaditya Ramadas and Jon McAul... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Maximilian Kasy and Anja Sautmann 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Karun Adusumilli Forthcoming 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Andr\'e 2025 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Patrik Guggenberger and Jiaqi Huang 2025 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Jiaying Gu and Roger Koenker 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Toru Kitagawa and Aleksey Tetenov 2018 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Susan Athey and Stefan Wager 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Peter J. Kempthorne 1987 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Whitney K. Newey and Daniel McFadden 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Lehmann, Erich Leo and Casella, George 1998 3 3 1.5 0.036 0.182 0%
46 KC Border 2013 3 2 1.5 0.036 0.159 0%
47 Pollard, David 2002 3 1 1.5 0.036 0.126 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.