Citation Analysis – Finite-Sample Nonparametric Bounds with an Application to the Causal Effect of Workforce Gender Diversity on Firm Performance

Citation Analysis

Finite-Sample Nonparametric Bounds with an Application to the Causal Effect of Workforce Gender Diversity on Firm Performance
Grace Lordan, Kaveh Salehzadeh Nobari
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01622

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,426

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Manski, Charles F	1990	8	6	15.0	0.108	1.000	100%
2	Manski, Charles F	2003	10	6	19.0	0.135	1.000	100%
3	Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, Jo	2009	7	5	13.0	0.095	1.000	100%
4	Kanter, Rosabeth Moss	1977	3	3	5.0	0.041	0.843	100%
5	Dedecker, Je	2007	3	2	6.0	0.041	0.737	100%
6	Dvoretzky, Aryeh and Kiefer, Jack and Wolfowitz, J...	1956	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
7	Tobin, James	1969	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
8	Tobin, James	1978	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
9	Roberson, Quinetta M	2006	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
10	Nishii, Lisa H	2013	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
11	Josten, Cecily and Lordan, Grace (self)	2025	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
12	Safiullah, Md and Akhter, Tanzina and Saona, Paolo...	2022	2	1	2.0	0.027	0.511	100%
13	Gordon Lan, KK and DeMets, David L	1983	2	1	4.0	0.027	0.511	100%
14	Hambrick, Donald C and Mason, Phyllis A	1984	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
15	Adams, Rene	2009	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
16	Post, Corinne and Byron, Kris	2015	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
17	\O	2011	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
18	Nathan, Max and Lee, Neil	2013	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
19	Hoogendoorn, Sander and Oosterbeek, Hessel and Van...	2013	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
20	Kanter, Rosabeth Moss	1987	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
21	Torchia, Mariateresa and Calabro	2011	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
22	Ali, Muhammad and Kulik, Carol T and Metz, Isabel	2011	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
23	Brainard, William C and Tobin, James	1968	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
24	Tobin, James and Brainard, William C	1976	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
25	Horowitz, Joel L and Manski, Charles F	1998	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
26	Casella, George and Berger, Roger	2024	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
27	Siegmund, David	2013	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
28	Pocock, Stuart J	1977	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
29	O'Brien, Peter C and Fleming, Thomas R	1979	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
30	Van Der Vaart, Aad W and Wellner, Jon A and van de...	1996	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
31	Scott, David W	2015	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
32	Almeida, Teresa and Dayan, Yehuda and Krause, Hele... (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
33	Vershynin, Roman	2018	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
34	Hoeffding, Wassily	1994	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
35	Kosorok, Michael R	2008	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
36	White, Halbert	2014	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
37	Merleve	2009	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
38	Rio, Emmanuel	2000	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
39	Massart, Pascal	1990	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
40	Newey, Whitney K. and West, Kenneth D.	1987	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Manski, Charles F

1990

15.0

0.108

1.000

100%

Manski, Charles F

2003

19.0

0.135

1.000

100%

Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, Jo

2009

13.0

0.095

1.000

100%

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss

1977

5.0

0.041

0.843

100%

Dedecker, Je

2007

6.0

0.041

0.737

100%

Dvoretzky, Aryeh and Kiefer, Jack and Wolfowitz, J...

1956

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Tobin, James

1969

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Tobin, James

1978

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Roberson, Quinetta M

2006

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Nishii, Lisa H

2013

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Josten, Cecily and Lordan, Grace (self)

2025

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Safiullah, Md and Akhter, Tanzina and Saona, Paolo...

2022

2.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Gordon Lan, KK and DeMets, David L

1983

4.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Hambrick, Donald C and Mason, Phyllis A

1984

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Adams, Rene

2009

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Post, Corinne and Byron, Kris

2015

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

2011

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Nathan, Max and Lee, Neil

2013

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Hoogendoorn, Sander and Oosterbeek, Hessel and Van...

2013

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss

1987

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Torchia, Mariateresa and Calabro

2011

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Ali, Muhammad and Kulik, Carol T and Metz, Isabel

2011

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Brainard, William C and Tobin, James

1968

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Tobin, James and Brainard, William C

1976

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Horowitz, Joel L and Manski, Charles F

1998

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Casella, George and Berger, Roger

2024

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Siegmund, David

2013

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Pocock, Stuart J

1977

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

O'Brien, Peter C and Fleming, Thomas R

1979

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Van Der Vaart, Aad W and Wellner, Jon A and van de...

1996

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Scott, David W

2015

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Almeida, Teresa and Dayan, Yehuda and Krause, Hele... (self)

2024

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Vershynin, Roman

2018

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Hoeffding, Wassily

1994

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Kosorok, Michael R

2008

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

White, Halbert

2014

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Merleve

2009

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Rio, Emmanuel

2000

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Massart, Pascal

1990

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Newey, Whitney K. and West, Kenneth D.

1987

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.