Citation Analysis

\textbfOn the Estimation of Multinomial Logit and Nested Logit Models: A Conic Optimization Approach
Hoang Giang Pham, Tien Mai, Minh Ha Hoang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01562
108
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
12
Sections
3,580
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. and Lerman, Steven R. 1985 5 3 4.5 0.046 1.000 100%
2 Train, Kenneth 2009 20 7 19.0 0.185 1.000 100%
3 MOSEK ApS 2024 7 4 10.5 0.065 1.000 100%
4 Boyd, Stephen and Vandenberghe, Lieven 2004 4 3 4.5 0.037 0.928 100%
5 Daganzo, Carlos F. and Kusnic, Michael 1993 4 3 5.0 0.037 0.928 100%
6 Nesterov, Yurii and Nemirovskii, Arkadi 1994 6 5 7.0 0.056 0.874 67%
7 McFadden, Daniel 1974 3 3 3.5 0.028 0.843 100%
8 Nesterov, Yurii and Nemirovskii, Arkadi 1994 6 6 6.0 0.056 0.794 50%
9 Williams, H. C. W. L. 1977 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.737 100%
10 Daly, Andrew and Zachary, Simon 1978 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.737 100%
11 Daly, Andrew 1987 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.737 100%
12 Chares, Benjamin 2009 5 5 4.0 0.046 0.737 40%
13 Berndt, Ernst R. and Hall, Bronwyn H. and Hall, Ro... 1974 2 2 1.5 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Nocedal, Jorge and Wright, Stephen J. 2006 2 2 1.5 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright 2006 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.644 100%
16 M. Bierlaire 2006 2 2 1.5 0.019 0.644 100%
17 Ben-Tal, Aharon and Nemirovski, Arkadi 2001 10 5 6.5 0.093 0.585 20%
18 McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth 2000 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.511 100%
19 Bo 1993 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Hess, Stephane and Daly, Andrew 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Liu, Dong C. and Nocedal, Jorge 1989 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert and Friedman... 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Vovsha, Peter and Bekhor, Shlomo 2002 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Bierlaire, Michel 2003 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Bierlaire, Michel 2020 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Daly, Andrew 1999 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Greene, William H. 2016 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Croissant, Yves 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Brathwaite, Timothy 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Boyd, Stephen and Kim, Seung-Jean and Vandenberghe... 2007 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
31 McCullagh, Peter and Nelder, John A. 1989 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Cuturi, Marco 2013 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Namkoong, Hongseok and Duchi, John C. 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Mogens Fosgerau and Daniel McFadden and Michel Bie... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Milgrom, Paul and Segal, Ilya 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Tr... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Tien Mai (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.