Citation Analysis

Treatment effects for marginal decision-makers:\\ Everyone is marginal
Haotian Deng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21583

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

1,372

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Rosenbaum, Paul R. and Rubin, Donald B.	1983	2	2	4.0	0.118	0.644	100%
2	Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward J	2005	2	2	1.5	0.118	0.511	50%
3	Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist	1994	1	1	1.0	0.059	0.406	100%
4	Lee, David S	2009	1	1	1.0	0.059	0.406	100%
5	Deng, Haotian and Bijnens, Gert (self)	2025	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
6	Masashi Sugiyama and Matthias Krauledat and Klaus-...	2007	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
7	Hirano, Keisuke and Imbens, Guido W and Ridder, Ge...	2003	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
8	Imbens, Guido W	2004	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
9	Hombert, Johan and Schoar, Antoinette and Sraer, D...	2020	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
10	Branstetter, Lee and Lima, Francisco and Taylor, L...	2014	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
11	Heckman, James J. and Ichimura, Hidehiko and Todd,...	1997	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
12	Abadie, Alberto and Imbens, Guido W.	2006	1	1	2.0	0.059	0.406	100%
13			2	1	2.0	0.118	0.110	0%
14	James J. Heckman and Edward Vytlacil	2001	1	1	0.5	0.059	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.