Citation Analysis – \bf Multivariate quantile regression %

\bf Multivariate quantile regression %
Antonio F. Galvao, Gabriel Montes-Rojas
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15749

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,419

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Antonio Galvao and Kengo Kato and Gabriel Montes-R... (self)	2014	5	2	10.0	0.125	0.874	100%
2	Luciano de Castro	2019	3	2	6.0	0.075	0.737	100%
3	Linjie Ma and Roger Koenker	2006	3	2	6.0	0.075	0.737	100%
4	Liqiong Chen and Antonio F. Galvao and Suyong Song (self)	2021	3	2	6.0	0.075	0.737	100%
5	M. Hallin and D. Paindaveine and M. \vSiman	2010	2	2	3.0	0.050	0.644	100%
6	G. Montes-Rojas (self)	2019	2	2	3.0	0.050	0.644	100%
7	Victor Chernozhukov and Alfred Galichon and Mark H...	2015	2	2	3.0	0.050	0.644	100%
8	Guillaume Carlier and Victor Chernozhukov and Alfr...	2016	2	2	3.0	0.050	0.644	100%
9	Guillaume Carlier and Victor Chernozhukov and Alfr...	2017	2	2	3.0	0.050	0.644	100%
10	Joel Horowitz	1998	2	1	4.0	0.050	0.511	100%
11	Kaplan, David M. and Sun, Yixiao	2017	2	1	4.0	0.050	0.511	100%
12	Probal Chaudhuri	1996	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
13	V.I. Koltchinskii	1997	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
14	Biman Chakraborty	2003	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
15	Ying Wei	2008	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
16	D. Paindaveine and M. \vSiman	2011	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
17	D. Paindaveine and M. \vSiman	2012	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
18	Ricardo Fraiman and Beatriz Pateiro-Lopez	2012	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
19	G. Montes-Rojas (self)	2017	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
20	G. Montes-Rojas (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
21	Carole Bernard and Claudia Czado	2015	1	1	1.0	0.025	0.406	100%
22	Marc Hallin and Dimitri Konen	2024	1	1	2.0	0.025	0.406	100%
23	Roger Koenker and Gilbert W. Bassett	1978	1	1	2.0	0.025	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Antonio Galvao and Kengo Kato and Gabriel Montes-R... (self)

2014

10.0

0.125

0.874

100%

Luciano de Castro

2019

6.0

0.075

0.737

100%

Linjie Ma and Roger Koenker

2006

6.0

0.075

0.737

100%

Liqiong Chen and Antonio F. Galvao and Suyong Song (self)

2021

6.0

0.075

0.737

100%

M. Hallin and D. Paindaveine and M. \vSiman

2010

3.0

0.050

0.644

100%

G. Montes-Rojas (self)

2019

3.0

0.050

0.644

100%

Victor Chernozhukov and Alfred Galichon and Mark H...

2015

3.0

0.050

0.644

100%

Guillaume Carlier and Victor Chernozhukov and Alfr...

2016

3.0

0.050

0.644

100%

Guillaume Carlier and Victor Chernozhukov and Alfr...

2017

3.0

0.050

0.644

100%

Joel Horowitz

1998

4.0

0.050

0.511

100%

Kaplan, David M. and Sun, Yixiao

2017

4.0

0.050

0.511

100%

Probal Chaudhuri

1996

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

V.I. Koltchinskii

1997

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Biman Chakraborty

2003

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Ying Wei

2008

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

D. Paindaveine and M. \vSiman

2011

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

D. Paindaveine and M. \vSiman

2012

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Ricardo Fraiman and Beatriz Pateiro-Lopez

2012

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

G. Montes-Rojas (self)

2017

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

G. Montes-Rojas (self)

2022

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Carole Bernard and Claudia Czado

2015

1.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Marc Hallin and Dimitri Konen

2024

2.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Roger Koenker and Gilbert W. Bassett

1978

2.0

0.025

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.