Citation Analysis

2508.13110
Jiaying Gu, Nikolaos Ignatiadis, Azeem M. Shaikh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13110
79
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
8
Sections
3,079
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kline and Walters 2021 27 6 47.0 0.342 1.000 100%
2 Ignatiadis and Wager (self) 2022 9 6 17.0 0.114 1.000 100%
3 Arceo-Gomez and Campos-Vazquez 2014 3 3 5.0 0.038 0.843 100%
4 Fang, Santos, Shaikh, and Torgovitsky (self) 2023 3 2 5.0 0.038 0.737 100%
5 Robbins 1956 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
6 Efron 2019 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
7 Bertrand and Mullainathan 2004 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
8 Chernozhukov, Newey, and Santos 2023 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
9 Rozema and Schanzenbach 2019 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
10 Wernerfelt, Tuchman, Shapiro, and Moakler 2025 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
11 Gu and Koenker 2022 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
12 Metcalfe, Sollaci, and Syverson 2023 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
13 Coey and Hung 2022 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
14 Walters 2024 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
15 Imbens 2022 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
16 Nunley, Pugh, Romero, and Seals 2015 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 Wood 1999 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Romano and Shaikh (self) 2008 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Stoye 2009 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Scheffe 1953 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Anderson 1969 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Lord and Cressie 1975 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Lord and Stocking 1976 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Koenker and Mizera 2014 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Charnes and Cooper 1962 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Donoho 1994 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Armstrong and Kolesar 2018 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Bai, Huang, Moon, Shaikh, and Vytlacil (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 d'Haultfoeuille and Rathelot 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 McCullagh and Polson 2018 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Xiang, Ignatiadis, and McCullagh (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Yang, Van Zwet, Ignatiadis, and Nakagawa (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Kline, Rose, and Walters 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Gilraine, Gu, and McMillan 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Gu and Koenker 2023 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Mogstad, Romano, Shaikh, and Wilhelm (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Mogstad, Romano, Shaikh, and Wilhelm (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.