← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

The purpose of an estimator is what it does:\\ Misspecification, estimands, and over-identification
Isaiah Andrews, Jiafeng Chen, Otavio Tecchio
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13076
107
Citation mentions
82
Cited references
8
Sections
6,772
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chen, Xiaohong and Santos, Andres (self) 2018 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
2 Lars Peter Hansen 1982 4 2 5.0 0.037 0.811 100%
3 Hall, Alastair R and Inoue, Atsushi 2003 4 2 8.0 0.037 0.811 100%
4 White, Halbert 1982 3 2 6.0 0.028 0.737 100%
5 Armstrong, Timothy B and Kolesa 2021 3 3 4.5 0.028 0.737 67%
6 Koopmans, Tjalling C and Reiersol, Olav 1950 6 1 12.0 0.056 0.693 100%
7 Imbens, Guido W 1997 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
8 Abebe, Girum and Caria, A. Stefano and Ortiz-Ospin... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 Altonji, Joseph G and Segal, Lewis M 1996 3 1 6.0 0.028 0.585 100%
10 Hansen, Bruce E and Lee, Seojeong 2021 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
11 Andrews, Isaiah and Shapiro, Jesse M (self) 2024 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
12 Whitney K. Newey 1985 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
13 Mueller, Andreas I. and Spinnewijn, Johannes and T... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
14 Fumio Hayashi 2000 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
15 James Stock and Mark Watson 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
16 Russell Davidson and James Mackinnon 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
17 Magne Mogstad and Alexander Torgovitsky 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
18 Beer, Stafford 1985 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Joseph P. Simmons and Leif D. Nelson and Uri Simon... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Aris Spanos 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Breunig, Christoph and Hoderlein, Stefan 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 van der Vaart, Aad W 2000 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Neyman, Jerzy 1923/1990 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Pearl, Judea 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Richardson, Thomas S and Robins, James M 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Heckman, James and Pinto, Rodrigo 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Intriligator, Michael D 1983 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Woolridge, Jeffrey M 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Trygve Haavelmo 1943 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Trygve Haavelmo 1944 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Pearl, Judea 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Yitzhaki, Shlomo 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Bordalo, Pedro and Gennaioli, Nicola and Ma, Yuera... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Dawkins, Christina and Srinivasan, Thirukodikaval ... 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Hansen, Lars Peter and Jagannathan, Ravi 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Windmeijer, Frank 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Antra 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Einav, Liran and Finkelstein, Amy and Oostrom, Tam... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Lise, Jeremy and Postel-Vinay, Fabien 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Joshua D. Angrist 1998 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 de Chaisemartin, Clément and D'Haultfœuille, Xavie... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Brantly Callaway and Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Liyang Sun and Sarah Abraham 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 S\l 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Manudeep Bhuller and Henrik Sigstad 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Blandhol, Christine and Bonney, John and Mogstad, ... 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Michal Kolesar 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Isaiah Andrews (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Hull, Peter and Kolesá... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Jiafeng Chen (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Andrews, Isaiah and Barahona, Nano and Gentzkow, M... (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Ashesh Rambachan and Neil Shephard 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Michal Kolesár and Mikkel Plagborg-Møller 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Andrews, Donald W K and Kwon, Soonwoo (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Hiroaki Kaido and Francesca Molinari 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Jungbin Hwang and Byunghoon Kang and Seojeong Lee 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Hong, Han and Li, Jessie 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Brown, Bryan W and Newey, Whitney K 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Horowitz, Joel L 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Gary Chamberlain and Guido W Imbens 2003 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Halbert White 1980 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Seojeong Lee 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Seojeong Lee 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Kleibergen, Frank and Zhan, Zhaoguo 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Müller, Ulrich K. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Douglas Staiger and James H. Stock 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Andrews, Isaiah and Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro,... (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
71 Bonhomme, Ste 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Christensen, Timothy and Connault, Benjamin 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
73 Bourreau, Marc and Sun, Yutec and Verboven, Frank 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
74 García-Jimeno, Camilo and Iglesias, Angel and Yild... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
75 Karahan, Fatih and Pugsley, Benjamin and Şahin, Ay... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
76 Kelley, Erin M. and Lane, Gregory and Schönholzer,... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
77 Honoré, Bo and Jørgensen, Thomas and de Paula, Áur... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
78 Isaiah Andrews and Harvey Barnhard and Jake Carlso... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
79 Kitamura, Yuichi and Otsu, Taisuke and Evdokimov, ... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
80 Andrews, Isaiah and Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro,... (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
81 Fessler, Pirmin and Kasy, Maximilian 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
82 Timothy B. Armstrong and Patrick Kline and Liyang ... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.