← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Binary choice logit models with general fixed effects for panel and network data
Kevin Dano, Bo E. Honoré, Martin Weidner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11556
90
Citation mentions
56
Cited references
7
Sections
4,173
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bonhomme, S 2012 5 4 9.0 0.056 1.000 100%
2 Honoré, B. E. and M. Weidner (self) 2024 5 5 9.0 0.056 1.000 100%
3 Graham, B. S 2016 7 3 14.0 0.078 1.000 100%
4 Graham, B. S 2017 4 3 7.0 0.044 0.928 100%
5 Dano, K (self) 2023 5 5 7.5 0.056 0.928 80%
6 Rasch, G 1960 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
7 Kitazawa, Y 2022 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
8 Chamberlain, G 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
9 Charbonneau, K. B 2017 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfœuille, and L. Laage 2024 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Andersen, E. B 1970 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Cox, D. R 1958 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
13 Chamberlain, G 1984 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
14 Honore, B. E. and E. Kyriazidou 2000 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
15 Muris, C. and C. Pakel 2025 3 1 6.0 0.033 0.585 100%
16 Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott 1948 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Hahn, J. and W. Newey 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Arellano, M. and J. Hahn 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Fernández-Val, I. and M. Weidner (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Higgins, A. and K. Jochmans 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Manski, C 1987 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Pakes, A., J. Porter, M. Shepard, and S. Calder-Wa... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Chamberlain, G 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Khan, S., M. Ponomareva, and E. Tamer 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Hausman, J., B. H. Hall, and Z. Griliches 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Honore, B. E 1992 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Honore, B. E 1993 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Hu, L 2002 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Chamberlain, G 1992 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Wooldridge, J. M 1997 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Kyriazidou, E 1997 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Kyriazidou, E 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Mundlak, Y 1961 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Heckman, J. J 1981 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Mundlak, Y 1978 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Wooldridge, J. M 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Bellemare, M. F. and D. L. Millimet 2025 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Jochmans, K 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Chamberlain, G 1978 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Magnac, T 2004 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 D'Addio, A. C. and B. E. Honore 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Magnac, T 2000 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Chamberlain, G 1985 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Graham, B. S 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Kruiniger, H 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Dobronyi, C., J. Gu, and K. i. Kim 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Honore, B. E. and E. Kyriazidou 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Bekker, P. A 1994 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Donald, S. G. and W. K. Newey 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Alvarez, J. and M. Arellano 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Okui, R 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Pakel, C. and M. Weidner (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Arellano, M. and R. Carrasco 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Botosaru, I., I. Loh, and C. Muris 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Bonhomme, S., K. Dano, and B. S. Graham (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Bonhomme, S., K. Dano, and B. S. Graham (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.