← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Higher-order Gini indices: An axiomatic approach
Xia Han, Ruodu Wang, Qinyu Wu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10663
71
Citation mentions
53
Cited references
12
Sections
9,272
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Gavilan-Ruiz, J. M., Ruiz-Gándara, Á., Ortega-Iriz... 2024 5 4 6.5 0.070 0.928 80%
2 Gneiting, T 2011 4 2 6.0 0.056 0.811 100%
3 Casalaina-Martin, S., Frongillo, R., Morgan, T. an... 2017 3 2 5.0 0.042 0.737 100%
4 Wang, R. and Wei, Y (self) 2020 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
5 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
6 Wang, R., Wei, Y. and Willmot, G. E (self) 2020b 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
7 Furman, E., Wang, R. and Zitikis, R. (self) 2017 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
8 Wang, Q., Wang, R. and Wei, Y (self) 2020a 6 2 4.5 0.085 0.481 17%
9 Gini, C 1912 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
10 Gini, C 1921 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
11 Gastwirth, J. L 1972 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
12 Lerman, R. I. and Yitzhaki, S 1984 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 Kopczuk, W., Saez, E. and Song, J 2010 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Duclos, J. Y 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Kenworthy, L. and Pontusson, J 2005 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Atkinson, A. B. and Piketty T 2007 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Banerjee, A.V. and Duflo, E 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Atkinson, A. B. and Bourguignon, F 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Denneberg, D. 1990 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Furman, E. and Zitikis, R 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Eeckhoudt, L. and Laeven, R 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Yitzhaki, S 1982 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Ringuest, J. L., Graves, S. B. and Case, R. H 2004 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Zheng, F., Xu, L. D. and Tang, B 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Clarke, C. and Kopczuk, W 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Yaari, M. E 1987 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Schmeidler, D 1989 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Strack, P. and Wambach, A 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Gershkov, A., Moldovanu, B., Strack, P. and Zhang,... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Hartmann, L. and Kauffeldt, T. F 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Ceriani, L. and Verme, P 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Yitzhaki, S 1998 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Yitzhaki, S 2003 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Yitzhaki, S. and Schechtman, E 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Vila, R. and Saulo, H 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S. and Zabarankin, M 2006 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Frongillo, R. M. and Kash, I. A 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Gastwirth, J. L 1971 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J. E 1970 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Schmidt, U. and Zank, H 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Wang, R. and Wu, Q (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Follmer, H. and Schied, A. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Quiggin, J 1982 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D 1989 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. and Heath, D... 1999 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 Glasser, G 1962 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Pesenti, G., Wang, Q. and Wang, R (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
48 Nolde, N. and Ziegel, J. F 2017 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
49 Huber, P. J. and Ronchetti E. M 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
50 McNeil, A. J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
51 Boyd, S. P. and Vandenberghe, L 2004 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
52 Kratschmer, V., Schied, A. and Zahle, H 2014 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
53 Del Barrio, E., Gine, E. and Utzet, F 2005 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.