Citation Analysis – Treatment-Effect Estimation in Complex Designs under a Parallel-trends Assumption

Treatment-Effect Estimation in Complex Designs under a Parallel-trends Assumption
Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D'Haultfœuille
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07808

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,636

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2025	9	6	15.0	0.123	1.000	100%
2	Callaway, B. and P. H. Sant'Anna	2021	6	3	11.0	0.082	1.000	100%
3	Gentzkow, M., J. M. Shapiro, and M. Sinkinson	2011	5	4	8.0	0.068	0.928	80%
4	Borusyak, K., X. Jaravel, and J. Spiess	2024	4	3	7.0	0.055	0.928	100%
5	Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme	2012	4	3	7.0	0.055	0.928	100%
6	Graham, B. S. and J. L. Powell	2012	4	3	7.0	0.055	0.928	100%
7	de Chaisemartin, C., X. D'Haultfoeuille, F. Pasqui... (self)	2022	4	3	8.0	0.055	0.928	100%
8	Liu, L., Y. Wang, and Y. Xu	2024	4	3	8.0	0.055	0.928	100%
9	Sun, L. and S. Abraham	2021	3	3	5.0	0.041	0.843	100%
10	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2020	3	2	4.0	0.041	0.737	100%
11	de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)	2024	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
12	Chamberlain, G	1992	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
13	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2023	2	1	4.0	0.027	0.511	100%
14	Fricke, H	2017	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
15	Callaway, B., A. Goodman-Bacon, and P. H. Sant'Ann...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
16	Robins, J	1986	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
17	Burgess, R., R. Jedwab, E. Miguel, A. Morjaria, an...	2015	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
18	Favara, G. and J. Imbs	2015	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
19	Fuest, C., A. Peichl, and S. Siegloch	2018	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
20	Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist	1994	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
21	Small, D. S., Z. Tan, R. R. Ramsahai, S. A. Lorch,...	2017	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
22	Deryugina, T	2017	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
23	Krolikowski, P	2018	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
24	East, C. N., S. Miller, M. Page, and L. R. Wherry	2023	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
25	Gardner, J	2021	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
26	Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller	2010	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
27	Xu, Y	2017	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
28	Arkhangelsky, D., S. Athey, D. A. Hirshberg, G. W....	2021	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
29	Liu, L., Y. Wang, Y. Xu, Z. Liu, and S. Liu	2022b	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
30	Liu, L., Y. Wang, Y. Xu, Z. Liu, and S. Liu	2022a	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
31	Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke	2009	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
32	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2021	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
33	Newey, W. K	1984	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
34	De Tocqueville, A	1850	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2025

15.0

0.123

1.000

100%

Callaway, B. and P. H. Sant'Anna

2021

11.0

0.082

1.000

100%

Gentzkow, M., J. M. Shapiro, and M. Sinkinson

2011

8.0

0.068

0.928

80%

Borusyak, K., X. Jaravel, and J. Spiess

2024

7.0

0.055

0.928

100%

Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme

2012

7.0

0.055

0.928

100%

Graham, B. S. and J. L. Powell

2012

7.0

0.055

0.928

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., X. D'Haultfoeuille, F. Pasqui... (self)

2022

8.0

0.055

0.928

100%

Liu, L., Y. Wang, and Y. Xu

2024

8.0

0.055

0.928

100%

Sun, L. and S. Abraham

2021

5.0

0.041

0.843

100%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2020

4.0

0.041

0.737

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)

2024

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Chamberlain, G

1992

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2023

4.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Fricke, H

2017

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Callaway, B., A. Goodman-Bacon, and P. H. Sant'Ann...

2021

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Robins, J

1986

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Burgess, R., R. Jedwab, E. Miguel, A. Morjaria, an...

2015

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Favara, G. and J. Imbs

2015

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Fuest, C., A. Peichl, and S. Siegloch

2018

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist

1994

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Small, D. S., Z. Tan, R. R. Ramsahai, S. A. Lorch,...

2017

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Deryugina, T

2017

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Krolikowski, P

2018

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

East, C. N., S. Miller, M. Page, and L. R. Wherry

2023

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Gardner, J

2021

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller

2010

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Xu, Y

2017

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Arkhangelsky, D., S. Athey, D. A. Hirshberg, G. W....

2021

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Liu, L., Y. Wang, Y. Xu, Z. Liu, and S. Liu

2022b

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Liu, L., Y. Wang, Y. Xu, Z. Liu, and S. Liu

2022a

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke

2009

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2021

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K

1984

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

De Tocqueville, A

1850

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.