Citation Analysis

Conceptual winsorizing: An application to the social cost of carbon
Richard S. J. Tol
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07384
23
Citation mentions
20
Cited references
7
Sections
631
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Tol, Richard S. J. (self) 2023 4 4 7.0 0.174 0.928 100%
2 J. Paul Kelleher 2025 1 1 1.0 0.043 0.406 100%
3 van den Bergh 2014 1 1 1.0 0.043 0.406 100%
4 Havránek, Tomáš and Zuzana Irsova and Karel Janda ... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.043 0.406 100%
5 Pei Wang and Xiangzheng Deng and Huimin Zhou and S... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.043 0.406 100%
6 Frances C. Moore and Moritz A. Drupp and James Ris... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.043 0.406 100%
7 Donggyu Yi and Sungkyu Lee 2024 1 1 1.0 0.043 0.406 100%
8 Weitzman, Martin L. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
9 Tol, Richard S. J. (self) 2012 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
10 Thomas Hobbes 1651 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
11 Frederick van der Ploeg 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
12 John von Neumann 1944 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
13 Fankhauser, Samuel and Tol, Richard S. J.and Pearc... (self) 1997 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
14 Harstad, B. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
15 Tol, Richard S. J. (self) 2005 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
16 Tol, Richard S. J. (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
17 Richard S. J. Tol (self) 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
18 Keywan Riahi and Detlef P. van Vuuren and Elmar Kr... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
19 Kevin Rennert and Frank Errickson and Brian C. Pre... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
20 Tol, Richard S. J. (self) 1 1 2.0 0.043 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.