← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\sffamily\bfseries\huge\parfillskip=0pt \rightskip=0pt plus .5\textwidth \leftskip=0pt plus .5\textwidth \emergencystretch=.3\textwidth Relative Bias Under Imperfect Identification in Observational Causal Inference
Melody Huang, Cory McCartan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23743
49
Citation mentions
28
Cited references
9
Sections
14,216
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cinelli, C. and Hazlett, C 2020 7 6 11.5 0.143 0.950 86%
2 Hager, A. and Krakowski, K 2022 10 7 16.0 0.204 0.928 80%
3 Miao, W., Liu, L., Tchetgen, E. T., and Geng, Z 2015 3 2 5.0 0.061 0.737 100%
4 Cinelli, C. and Hazlett, C 2025 3 2 5.0 0.061 0.737 100%
5 Miao, W., Geng, Z., and Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J 2018 2 2 3.0 0.041 0.644 100%
6 Imbens, G. W 2003 2 2 3.0 0.041 0.644 100%
7 Cui, Y., Pu, H., Shi, X., Miao, W., and Tchetgen T... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
8 Rosenbaum, P. R 1987 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
9 Frank, K. A 2000 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
10 Tan, Z 2006 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
11 Carnegie, N. B., Harada, M., and Hill, J. L 2016 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Ding, P., Feller, A., and Miratrix, L 2019 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Zhao, Q., Small, D. S., and Bhattacharya, B. B 2019 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Hong, G., Yang, F., and Qin, X 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Dorn, J. and Guo, K 2023 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Huang, M. and Pimentel, S. D (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Kang, H., Jiang, Y., Zhao, Q., and Small, D. S 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Freidling, T. and Zhao, Q 2022 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 Cobzaru, R., Welsch, R., Finkelstein, S., Ng, K., ... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H 1949 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 Lewandowski, D., Kurowicka, D., and Joe, H 2009 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Huang, M. Y (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Hartman, E. and Huang, M (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Xu, L., Gotwalt, C., Hong, Y., King, C. B., and Me... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 Chernozhukov, V., Cinelli, C., Newey, W., Sharma, ... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Rosenbaum, P. R 2004 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Rosenbaum, P. R 2010 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 Huang, M., Soriano, D., and Pimentel, S. D (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.