← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Can large language models assist choice modelling? Insights into prompting strategies and current models capabilities
Georges Sfeir, Gabriel Nova, Stephane Hess, Sander van Cranenburgh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21790
92
Citation mentions
67
Cited references
8
Sections
9,894
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 4 3 7.0 0.043 0.928 100%
2 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
3 3 3 3.5 0.033 0.843 100%
4 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
5 3 3 5.0 0.033 0.843 100%
6 3 3 3.5 0.033 0.843 100%
7 3 2 6.0 0.033 0.737 100%
8 3 2 6.0 0.033 0.737 100%
9 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
13 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
14 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
15 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
16 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
17 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
61 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
62 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
63 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
65 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
67 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.