Citation Analysis – \vspace-0.5cm

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,294

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Lattimore and Szepesvari	2020	7	6	12.5	0.163	1.000	100%
2	Auer, Cesa-Bianchi and Fischer	2002	4	4	5.5	0.093	0.928	100%
3	Wald	1947	2	2	1.5	0.047	0.644	100%
4	Horvitz and Thompson	1952	2	2	3.0	0.047	0.644	100%
5	Vershynin	2018	2	2	4.0	0.047	0.644	100%
6	Thompson	1933	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
7	Robbins	1952	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
8	Rubin	1976	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
9	Freedman	1975	1	1	1.0	0.023	0.406	100%
10	Bubeck and Cesa-Bianchi	2012	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
11	Lai and Robbins	1985	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
12	Lai	1987	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
13	Lancewicki, Segal, Koren and Mansour	2021	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
14	Robins, Rotnitzky and Zhao	1994	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
15	Bang and Robins	2005	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
16	Cattaneo	2010	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
17	Farrell	2015	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
18	Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,...	2018	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
19	Athey and Wager	2021	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
20	Kallus, Mao, Wang and Zhou	2022	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
21	Shen, Cai and Song	2024	1	1	0.5	0.023	0.406	100%
22	Adusumilli	2024	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
23	Wainwright	2019	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
24	Rosenbaum and Rubin	1983	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
25	Imbens	2004	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
26	Wooldridge	2010	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
27	Ahrens, Chernozhukov, Hansen, Kozbur, Schaffer and...	2025	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
28	Crump, Hotz, Imbens and Mitnik	2009	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
29	Khan and Ugander	2025	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
30	Ma and Wang	2020	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%
31	Boyd and Vandenberghe	2004	1	1	2.0	0.023	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Lattimore and Szepesvari

2020

12.5

0.163

1.000

100%

Auer, Cesa-Bianchi and Fischer

2002

5.5

0.093

0.928

100%

Wald

1947

1.5

0.047

0.644

100%

Horvitz and Thompson

1952

3.0

0.047

0.644

100%

Vershynin

2018

4.0

0.047

0.644

100%

Thompson

1933

1.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Robbins

1952

1.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Rubin

1976

1.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Freedman

1975

1.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Bubeck and Cesa-Bianchi

2012

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Lai and Robbins

1985

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Lai

1987

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Lancewicki, Segal, Koren and Mansour

2021

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Robins, Rotnitzky and Zhao

1994

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Bang and Robins

2005

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Cattaneo

2010

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Farrell

2015

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,...

2018

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Athey and Wager

2021

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Kallus, Mao, Wang and Zhou

2022

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Shen, Cai and Song

2024

0.5

0.023

0.406

100%

Adusumilli

2024

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Wainwright

2019

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Rosenbaum and Rubin

1983

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Imbens

2004

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Wooldridge

2010

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Ahrens, Chernozhukov, Hansen, Kozbur, Schaffer and...

2025

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Crump, Hotz, Imbens and Mitnik

2009

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Khan and Ugander

2025

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Ma and Wang

2020

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Boyd and Vandenberghe

2004

2.0

0.023

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.