Citation Analysis – Identifying Present-Biased Discount Functions in Dynamic Discrete Choice Models\protect

Identifying Present-Biased Discount Functions in Dynamic Discrete Choice Models\protect
Jaap H. Abbring, Øystein Daljord, Fedor Iskhakov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07286

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,264

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Abbring, J. H. and \O . Daljord (self)		5	3	8.0	0.078	1.000	100%
2	Fang, H. and Y. Wang	2015	10	3	13.0	0.156	1.000	100%
3	Daljord, O. y., J.-P. Dube, and X. Kong (self)	2020	6	1	12.0	0.094	0.693	100%
4	Chan, M	2017	4	1	4.0	0.062	0.644	100%
5	Mahajan, A., C. Michel, and A. Tarozzi	2019	4	1	4.0	0.062	0.644	100%
6	Cox, D., J. Little, and D. O'Shea	2015	3	1	6.0	0.047	0.585	100%
7	Peeters, R		2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
8	Dube, J.-P., G. J. Hitsch, and P. E. Rossi	2010	2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
9	Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O'Donoghue		1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
10	Urminsky, O. and G. Zauberman	2015	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
11	Yao, S., C. F. Mela, J. Chiang, and Y. Chen	2012	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
12	Lee, R	2013	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
13	Chung, D. J., T. Steenburgh, and K. Sudhir	2014	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
14	Bollinger, B	2015	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
15	De Groote, O. and F. Verboven		1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
16	Daljord, \O ., D. Nekipelov, and M. Park (self)	2019	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
17	Abbring, J. H. and \O . Daljord (self)	2020a	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
18	Malmendier, U. and S. DellaVigna	2006	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
19	Norets, A. and X. Tang	2014	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
20	Aguirregabiria, V. and J. Suzuki	2014	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
21	Kalouptsidi, M., P. T. Scott, and E. Souza-Rodrigu...	2018	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
22	Elster, J	1985	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
23	O'Donoghue, T. and M. Rabin		1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
24	Hotz, V. J. and R. A. Miller	1993	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
25	Rust, J	1994	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
26	Magnac, T. and D. Thesmar	2002	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
27	Arcidiacono, P. and R. Miller	2011	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
28	Bezout, E	1764	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
29	Blevins, J. R	2014	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
30	Farrell, J. and P. Klemperer	2007	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
31	Becker, G. S. and K. M. Murphy	1988	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
32	Gordon, B. R. and B. Sun	2015	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
33	Ericson, K. M. M., J. M. White, D. Laibson, and J....	2015	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
34			2	1	1.0	0.031	0.110	0%
35	Laibson, D., A. Repetto, and J. Tobacman		1	1	0.5	0.016	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Abbring, J. H. and \O . Daljord (self)

8.0

0.078

1.000

100%

Fang, H. and Y. Wang

2015

13.0

0.156

1.000

100%

Daljord, O. y., J.-P. Dube, and X. Kong (self)

2020

12.0

0.094

0.693

100%

Chan, M

2017

4.0

0.062

0.644

100%

Mahajan, A., C. Michel, and A. Tarozzi

2019

4.0

0.062

0.644

100%

Cox, D., J. Little, and D. O'Shea

2015

6.0

0.047

0.585

100%

Peeters, R

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Dube, J.-P., G. J. Hitsch, and P. E. Rossi

2010

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O'Donoghue

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Urminsky, O. and G. Zauberman

2015

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Yao, S., C. F. Mela, J. Chiang, and Y. Chen

2012

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Lee, R

2013

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Chung, D. J., T. Steenburgh, and K. Sudhir

2014

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Bollinger, B

2015

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

De Groote, O. and F. Verboven

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Daljord, \O ., D. Nekipelov, and M. Park (self)

2019

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Abbring, J. H. and \O . Daljord (self)

2020a

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Malmendier, U. and S. DellaVigna

2006

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Norets, A. and X. Tang

2014

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, V. and J. Suzuki

2014

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Kalouptsidi, M., P. T. Scott, and E. Souza-Rodrigu...

2018

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Elster, J

1985

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

O'Donoghue, T. and M. Rabin

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Hotz, V. J. and R. A. Miller

1993

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Rust, J

1994

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Magnac, T. and D. Thesmar

2002

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Arcidiacono, P. and R. Miller

2011

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Bezout, E

1764

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Blevins, J. R

2014

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Farrell, J. and P. Klemperer

2007

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Becker, G. S. and K. M. Murphy

1988

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Gordon, B. R. and B. Sun

2015

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Ericson, K. M. M., J. M. White, D. Laibson, and J....

2015

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

1.0

0.031

0.110

Laibson, D., A. Repetto, and J. Tobacman

0.5

0.016

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.