Citation Analysis

\textbfIdentification of Causal Effects with a Bunching Design
Carolina Caetano, Gregorio Caetano, Leonard Goff, Eric Nielsen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05210
107
Citation mentions
65
Cited references
14
Sections
6,892
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Caetano, C (self) 2015 7 4 12.0 0.065 1.000 100%
2 Almond, D., Chay, K. Y., and Lee, D. S 2005 11 3 18.5 0.103 0.969 91%
3 Goff, L (self) 2023 4 4 7.0 0.037 0.928 100%
4 Pinkse, J. and Schurter, K 2023 6 2 11.0 0.056 0.874 100%
5 Caetano, C., Caetano, G., and Nielsen, E (self) 2024b 4 4 5.5 0.037 0.843 75%
6 Bertanha, M., Caetano, C., Jales, H., and Seegert,... (self) 2024 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
7 Schennach, S 2022 4 4 6.5 0.037 0.843 75%
8 Schennach, S. M 2019 3 2 5.0 0.028 0.737 100%
9 Saez, E 2010 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Blomquist, S., Newey, W. K., Kumar, A., and Liang,... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Bertanha, M., McCallum, A. H., and Seegert, N 2023 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Caetano, G. and Maheshri, V (self) 2018 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Caetano, C., Caetano, G., Nielsen, E., and Techio,... (self) 2024c 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Kleven, H. J 2016 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Cheng, M.-Y., Fan, J., and Marron, J. S 1997 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 Fan, J. and Gijbels, I 1992 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
17 Lu, Y., Wang, J., and Xie, H 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
18 Caetano, C., Rothe, C., and Y\ild\iz, N (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Caetano, C., Caetano, G., Fe, H., and Nielsen, E (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Khalil, U. and Y\ild\iz, N 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Caetano, C., Caetano, G., and Techio, O (self) 2024d 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Caetano, G., Mansfield, J., and Slichter, D (self) 2025b 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Jales, H. and Yu, Z 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Blomquist, S., Hausman, J. A., and Newey, W. K 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Hoderlein, S. and Mammen, E 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Imbens, G. W. and Newey, W. K 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Chiang, H. D. and Sasaki, Y 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Sasaki, Y 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Kato, R. and Sasaki, Y 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Callaway, B., Goodman-Bacon, A., and Sant'Anna, P.... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Fremlin, D 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Kleven, H. J. and Waseem, M 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Pollinger, S 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Hamedani, G. G 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Ruppert, D. and Wand, M 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Fan, J. and Gijbels, I 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Cheruiyot, L. R 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Imbens, G. and Wager, S 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Li, Q. and Racine, J. S 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Hjort, N. and Jones, M 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Loader, C. R 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Zhang, S. and Karunamuni, R. J 1998 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Bouezmarni, T. and Rombouts, J. V 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., and Ma, X 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Ruppert, D., Sheather, S. J., and Wand, M. P 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Imbens, G. and Kalyanaraman, K 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Arai, Y. and Ichimura, H 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Arai, Y. and Ichimura, H 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., and Farrell, M. H 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Delaigle, A. and Gijbels, I 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., and Titiunik, R 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Noack, C. and Rothe, C 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 He, Y. and Bartalotti, O 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Armstrong, T. B. and Kolesar, M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Goldman, M. and Kaplan, D. M 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., and Salvanes, K. G 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Fan, J., Gijbels, I., Hu, T.-C., and Huang, L.-S 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Goff, L., Kédagni, D., and Wu, H (self) 2024 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.110 0%
59 Bonhomme, S. and Manresa, E 2015 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
60 Bonhomme, S., Lamadon, T., and Manresa, E 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
61 Cheng, X., Schorfheide, F., and Shao, P 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
62 Cytrynbaum, M 2020 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
63 Caetano, C., Caetano, G., and Nielsen, E (self) 2024a 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
64 Caetano, C., Caetano, G., Nielsen, E., and Sanfeli... (self) 2025a 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
65 Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.