Citation Analysis

Extrapolation in Regression Discontinuity Design Using Comonotonicity
Ben Deaner, Soonwoo Kwon
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00289

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,416

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	6	2	3.0	0.109	0.693	50%
2	2	2	2.5	0.036	0.644	100%
3	5	2	5.5	0.091	0.644	40%
4	3	2	4.5	0.055	0.644	67%
5	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.511	50%
6	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.511	50%
7	2	2	1.0	0.036	0.511	50%
8	2	2	1.0	0.036	0.511	50%
9	4	2	2.0	0.073	0.511	25%
10	3	2	1.5	0.055	0.511	33%
11	3	2	1.5	0.055	0.511	33%
12	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
13	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
14	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
15	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
16	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
17	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
18	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
19	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
20	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
21	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
22	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
23	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
24	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
25	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.406	100%
26	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
27	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
28	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
29	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
30	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
31	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.087	0%
32	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.