← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Robust Inference with High-Dimensional Instruments
Qu Feng, Sombut Jaidee, Wenjie Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23834
125
Citation mentions
94
Cited references
6
Sections
2,250
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lee, D. S., J. McCrary, M. J. Moreira, and J. R. P... 2022 3 2 4.0 0.024 0.737 100%
2 Feng, Q., S. Jaidee, G. Pan, and W. Zhu (self) 2024 4 4 5.0 0.032 0.737 50%
3 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
4 Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hans... 2012 4 1 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
5 4 1 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
6 Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang (self) 2024b 2 2 2.0 0.016 0.644 100%
7 Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun 2022 3 1 3.0 0.024 0.585 100%
8 Carrasco, M. and G. Tchuente 2015 3 1 3.0 0.024 0.585 100%
9 Anatolyev, S. and N. Gospodinov 2011 3 1 3.0 0.024 0.585 100%
10 3 1 3.0 0.024 0.585 100%
11 Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C... 2012 3 1 3.0 0.024 0.585 100%
12 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
13 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
14 Boot, T. and D. Nibbering 2024 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
15 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
16 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
17 Carrasco, M 2012 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
18 Hansen, C. and D. Kozbur 2014 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
19 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
20 Maestas, N., K. J. Mullen, and A. Strand 2013 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
21 Sampat, B. and H. L. Williams 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Dobbie, W., J. Goldin, and C. S. Yang 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth 1973 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Shanken, J 1992 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Anatolyev, S. and A. Mikusheva 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Bartik, T. J 1991 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Blanchard, O. J., L. F. Katz, R. E. Hall, and B. E... 1992 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Deryugina, T., G. Heutel, N. H. Miller, D. Molitor... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Bondy, M., S. Roth, and L. Sager 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Gabaix, X. and R. S. Koijen 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 S\loczy\'nski, T 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Davey Smith, G. and S. Ebrahim 2003 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Davies, N. M., S. von Hinke Kessler Scholder, H. F... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Kunitomo, N 1980 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Morimune, K 1983 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Donald, S. G. and W. K. Newey 2001 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Chamberlain, G. and G. Imbens 2004 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Stock, J. and M. Yogo 2005 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Han, C. and P. C. Phillips 2006 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Anderson, T., N. Kunitomo, and Y. Matsushita 2010 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Kuersteiner, G. and R. Okui 2010 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen 2011 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Okui, R 2011 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Kolesar, M 2013 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Wang, W. and M. Kaffo (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Kolesar, M 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Evdokimov, K. S. and M. Kolesar 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 S\olvsten, M 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, and T. Woutersen 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 Angrist, J. and B. Frandsen 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 Athey, S., J. Tibshirani, and S. Wager 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 Carrasco, M. and G. Tchuente 2016a 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Carrasco, M. and M. Doukali 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 Carrasco, M. and G. Tchuente 2016b 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 Crudu, F., G. Mellace, and Z. Sandor 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 Dov\`\i, M.-S., A. B. Kock, and S. Mavroeidis 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 Tuvaandorj, P 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 Matsushita, Y. and T. Otsu 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang (self) 2024a 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 Navjeevan, M 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
68 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
69 Yap, L 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
70 Anatolyev, S. and M. S\olvsten 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
71 Ligtenberg, J. W 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
72 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
73 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
74 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
76 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
77 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
78 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
79 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2002 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
80 Bai, Z. D., B. Q. Miao, and G. M. Pan 2007 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
81 Onatski, A., M. J. Moreira, and M. Hallin 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
82 Khan, S., X. Lan, E. Tamer, and Q. Yao 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
83 Karoui, N. E 2008 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
84 Dobriban, E. and S. Wager 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
85 Hastie, T., A. Montanari, S. Rosset, and R. J. Tib... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
86 Li, S., L. Zhang, T. T. Cai, and H. Li 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
87 Farbmacher, H., R. Groh, M. Muhlegger, and G. Voll... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
88 Zhang, Z., P. Ding, W. Zhou, and H. Wang (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
89 Chudik, A., M. H. Pesaran, and E. Tosetti 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
90 Li, J. and S. X. Chen 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
91 Kojevnikov, D., V. Marmer, and K. Song 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
92 Kim, M. S. and Y. Sun 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
93 Bhattacharya, A. and D. B. Dunson 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
94 Bai, Z. D. and J. W. Silverstein 1998 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.