← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Design-Based and Network Sampling-Based Uncertainties in Network Experiments
Kensuke Sakamoto, Yuya Shimizu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22989
142
Citation mentions
79
Cited references
13
Sections
11,586
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cai, J., de Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E 2015 12 5 22.0 0.085 1.000 100%
2 Aronow, P. M. and Samii, C 2017 5 4 7.0 0.035 1.000 100%
3 Leung, M. P 2022 6 5 9.0 0.042 1.000 100%
4 Gao, M. and Ding, P 2023 9 5 14.0 0.063 1.000 100%
5 Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. and Wooldridg... 2020 10 7 17.0 0.070 1.000 100%
6 Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Hull, P. and Kolesar, M 2022 7 2 9.0 0.049 0.874 100%
7 Carter, M., Laajaj, R. and Yang, D 2021 3 3 5.0 0.021 0.843 100%
8 Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E. and ... 2013 4 2 8.0 0.028 0.811 100%
9 Borusyak, K. and Hull, P 2023 3 2 6.0 0.021 0.737 100%
10 Dizon, F., Gong, E. and Jones, K 2020 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
11 Beaman, L., BenYishay, A., Magruder, J. and Mobara... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
12 Griffith, A 2022 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
13 Borusyak, K. and Hull, P 2024 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
14 Viviano, D 2024 3 1 3.0 0.021 0.585 100%
15 Chandrasekhar, A. and Lewis, R 2016 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
16 Kojevnikov, D., Marmer, V. and Song, K 2021 5 2 4.0 0.035 0.511 20%
17 Fernando, A. N 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
18 Hoshino, T. and Yanagi, T 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
19 Xu, R. and Wooldridge, J. M 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
20 Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. and Wooldridg... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
21 Lewbel, A., Qu, X. and Tang, X 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
22 Hsieh, C.-S., Hsu, Y.-C., Ko, S. I., Kovarik, J. a... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
23 Angrist, J. D 1998 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
24 Conley, T. G. and Udry, C. R 2010 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Kolaczyk, E. D. and Csardi, G 2014 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Miguel, E. and Kremer, M 2004 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Leung, M. P 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.110 0%
29 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.110 0%
30 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
31 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
32 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
33 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
34 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
35 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
36 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
37 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
38 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
39 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
40 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
41 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
42 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
43 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
44 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
45 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
46 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
47 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
48 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
49 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
50 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
51 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
52 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
53 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
54 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
55 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
56 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
57 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
58 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
59 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
60 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
61 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
62 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
63 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
64 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
65 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
66 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
67 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
68 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
69 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
70 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
71 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
72 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
73 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
74 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
75 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
76 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
77 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
78 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
79 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.