← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfCausal Inference for Aggregated Treatment
Carolina Caetano, Gregorio Caetano, Brantly Callaway, Derek Dyal
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22885
99
Citation mentions
59
Cited references
10
Sections
12,239
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Caetano, Caetano, Nielsen (self) 2024 6 3 10.0 0.061 1.000 100%
2 de Chaisemartin, D'Haultfoeuille 2020 4 4 6.5 0.040 0.843 75%
3 Rubin 1980 3 2 4.0 0.030 0.737 100%
4 VanderWeele, Hernán 2013 3 2 4.0 0.030 0.737 100%
5 Imbens, Rubin 2015 3 2 4.0 0.030 0.737 100%
6 Hernán 2016 3 3 4.5 0.030 0.737 67%
7 Mejia, Restrepo 2016 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
8 VanderWeele 2009 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
9 Hernán, VanderWeele 2011 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Blandhol, Bonney, Mogstad, Torgovitsky 2025 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 Yitzhaki 1996 3 2 4.5 0.030 0.644 67%
12 Goodman-Bacon 2021 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
13 Caetano, Caetano, Callaway, Dyal (self) 2025 13 7 11.0 0.131 0.613 23%
14 Callaway, Goodman-Bacon, Sant'Anna (self) 2025 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
15 Angrist 1998 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
16 Sloczynski 2022 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
17 Hahn 2023 3 2 3.0 0.030 0.511 33%
18 Rubin 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 Card, Mas, Rothstein 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Böhlmark, Willén 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Lowe 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Sacerdote 2001 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Carrell, Fullerton, West 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Greenbaum, Tita 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Tita, Petras, Greenbaum 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Ihlanfeldt, Mayock 2010 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Boustan, Kahn, Rhode, Yanguas 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Zhao, Zheng, Fu 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Finkelstein, Taubman, Wright, Bernstein, Gruber, N... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Allcott, Diamond, Dubé, Handbury, Rahkovsky, Schne... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Barth, Papageorge, Thom 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Houmark, Ronda, Rosholm 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Fiorini, Keane 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Caetano, Kinsler, Teng (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Jurges, Khanam 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Cole, Frangakis 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Laffers, Mellace 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Adusumilli, Agostinelli, Borghesan 2025 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Rubin 1974 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Holland 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Heckman, Smith, Clements 1997 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Rosenbaum 2002 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Lechner 2002 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Plesca, Smith 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 McCall, Smith, Wunsch 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Caetano, Maheshri (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Smith 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Heiler, Knaus 2025 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Federal Bureau of Investigation 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Federal Bureau of Investigation 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Robins, Greenland 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Ishimaru 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Sun, Abraham 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Caetano, Callaway (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Mogstad, Torgovitsky 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 Hasegawa, Deshpande, Small, Rosenbaum 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Lewis 1973 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
58 Aronow, Samii 2016 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
59 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull, Kolesár 2024 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.