Citation Analysis – Multilevel Decomposition of Generalized Entropy Measures Using Constrained Bayes Estimation: An Application to Japanese Regional Data

Citation Analysis

Multilevel Decomposition of Generalized Entropy Measures Using Constrained Bayes Estimation: An Application to Japanese Regional Data
Yuki Kawakubo, Kazuhiko Kakamu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21213

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,796

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Kakamu, K. and Fukushige, M (self)	2009	3	2	4.0	0.073	0.737	100%
2	Chotikapanich, D., Griffiths, W.E., Rao, D.S.P. an...	2012	3	2	4.0	0.073	0.737	100%
3	Lubrano, M. and Ndoye, A.A.J	2016	3	2	4.0	0.073	0.737	100%
4	Datta, G.S., Ghosh, M., Steorts, R. and Maples, J	2011	3	2	5.0	0.073	0.737	100%
5	Piketty, T	2003	3	1	3.0	0.073	0.585	100%
6	Moriguchi, C. and Saez, E	2008	3	1	3.0	0.073	0.585	100%
7	Cowell, F.A. and Kuga, K	1981	2	1	2.0	0.049	0.511	100%
8	Bourguignon, F	1979	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
9	Cowell, F.A	2000	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
10	Cowell, F.A	1985	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
11	Akita, T	2003	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
12	Anand, S. and Segal, P	2015	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
13	Theil, H	1967	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
14	Atkinson, A.B	1970	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
15	Cowell, F.A	1980	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
16	Shorrocks, A.F	1980	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
17	Tachibanaki T	2005	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
18	Ohtake F	2008	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
19	McDonald, J.B	1984	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
20	Singh, S.K. and Maddala, G.S	1976	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
21	Ghosh, M	1992	1	1	1.0	0.024	0.406	100%
22	Sarabia, J.M., Jord\'a, V. and Remuzgo, L	2017	1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%
23	Kubokawa, T., Hasukawa, M. and Takahashi, K	2014	1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%
24	Ghosh, M., Kubokawa, T. and Kawakubo, Y (self)	2015	1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%
25			1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%
26			1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%
27	Chotikapanich D. and Griffiths W.E	2000	1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%
28	Kakamu K	2016	1	1	2.0	0.024	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Kakamu, K. and Fukushige, M (self)

2009

4.0

0.073

0.737

100%

Chotikapanich, D., Griffiths, W.E., Rao, D.S.P. an...

2012

4.0

0.073

0.737

100%

Lubrano, M. and Ndoye, A.A.J

2016

4.0

0.073

0.737

100%

Datta, G.S., Ghosh, M., Steorts, R. and Maples, J

2011

5.0

0.073

0.737

100%

Piketty, T

2003

3.0

0.073

0.585

100%

Moriguchi, C. and Saez, E

2008

3.0

0.073

0.585

100%

Cowell, F.A. and Kuga, K

1981

2.0

0.049

0.511

100%

Bourguignon, F

1979

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Cowell, F.A

2000

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Cowell, F.A

1985

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Akita, T

2003

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Anand, S. and Segal, P

2015

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Theil, H

1967

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Atkinson, A.B

1970

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Cowell, F.A

1980

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Shorrocks, A.F

1980

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Tachibanaki T

2005

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Ohtake F

2008

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

McDonald, J.B

1984

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Singh, S.K. and Maddala, G.S

1976

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Ghosh, M

1992

1.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Sarabia, J.M., Jord\'a, V. and Remuzgo, L

2017

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Kubokawa, T., Hasukawa, M. and Takahashi, K

2014

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Ghosh, M., Kubokawa, T. and Kawakubo, Y (self)

2015

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Chotikapanich D. and Griffiths W.E

2000

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Kakamu K

2016

2.0

0.024

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.