← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Orthogonality conditions for convex regression
Sheng Dai, Timo Kuosmanen, Xun Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21110
74
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
9
Sections
7,398
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kuosmanen (self) 2008 6 3 11.0 0.081 1.000 100%
2 Seijo and Sen 2011 6 4 11.0 0.081 1.000 100%
3 Olley and Pakes 1996 3 3 5.0 0.041 0.843 100%
4 Collard-Wexler and De Loecker 2016 3 3 5.0 0.041 0.843 100%
5 Afriat 1967 4 2 7.0 0.054 0.811 100%
6 Afriat 1972 3 2 5.0 0.041 0.737 100%
7 Yatchew 2003 3 2 5.0 0.041 0.737 100%
8 Levinsohn and Petrin 2003 3 2 5.0 0.041 0.737 100%
9 Kuosmanen and Kortelainen (self) 2012 3 2 6.0 0.041 0.737 100%
10 Hildreth 1954 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
11 Lim and Glynn 2012 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
12 Dai, Kuosmanen and Zhou (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
13 Chetverikov and Wilhelm 2017 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
14 Ackerberg, Caves and Frazer 2015 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
15 R\odseth, Kuosmanen and Holmen (self) 2025 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
16 Tsionas 2022 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
17 Gandhi, Navarro and Rivers 2020 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
18 Brunk 1955 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Brunk 1958 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Varian 1982 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Varian 1984 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Hannah and Dunson 2013 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Mazumder, Choudhury, Iyengar and Sen 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Yagi, Chen, Johnson and Kuosmanen (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Bertsimas and Mundru 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Kuosmanen and Zhou (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Dai, Kuosmanen and Zhou (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Dong, Ma and Shen 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Liao, Dai, Lim and Kuosmanen (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Marschak and Andrews 1944 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Eisenhauer 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Wooldridge 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Terza, Basu and Rathouz 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Amsler, Prokhorov and Schmidt 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Johnson and Kuosmanen (self) 2011 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Johnson and Kuosmanen (self) 2012 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Robinson 1988 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Dai, Fang, Lee and Kuosmanen (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Mutter, Greene, Spector, Rosko and Mukamel 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Dai, Kuosmanen and Zhou (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.