← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

An Empirical Comparison of Weak-IV-Robust Procedures in Just-Identified Models
Wenze Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18001
64
Citation mentions
55
Cited references
5
Sections
2,464
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lee, David S and McCrary, Justin and Moreira, Marc... 2022 8 5 9.5 0.125 0.855 62%
2 2 2 2.0 0.031 0.511 50%
3 2 1 2.0 0.031 0.511 100%
4 Young, Alwyn 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
5 Anderson, Theodore W and Rubin, Herman 1949 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
6 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
7 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
8 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
9 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
10 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
11 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
12 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Stock, James H and Yogo, Motohiro 2002 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Keane, Michael and Neal, Timothy 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Keane, Michael P and Neal, Timothy 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Lee, David S and McCrary, Justin and Moreira, Marc... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Crudu, Federico and Mellace, Giovanni and Sa 2021 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Mikusheva, Anna and Sun, Liyang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Matsushita, Yukitoshi and Otsu, Taisuke 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Dov\`\i 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Navjeevan, Manu 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Lim, Dennis and Wang, Wenjie and Zhang, Yichong 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Yap, Luther 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Wang, Wenjie and Liu, Qingfeng 2015 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
33 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
34 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
37 MacKinnon, James G 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
38 Wang, Wenjie and Zhang, Yichong 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
39 Rosenthal, Stuart S 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
40 Di Tella, Rafael and Perez-Truglia, Ricardo and Ba... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
41 Field, Erica and Pande, Rohini and Papp, John and ... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
42 Rao, Gautam 2019 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
43 Moser, Petra and Voena, Alessandra and Waldinger, ... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
44 Voigtla 2013 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
45 Hornung, Erik 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
46 Ottaviano, Gianmarco I P and Peri, Giovanni and Wr... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
47 Alesina, Alberto and Stantcheva, Stefanie and Teso... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
48 Campante, Filipe R and Do, Quoc-Anh 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
49 Decarolis, Francesco 2015 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
50 Fabra, Natalia and Reguant, Mar 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
51 Steinwender, Claudia 2018 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
52 Condra, Luke N and Long, James D and Shaver, Andre... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
53 Brollo, Fernanda and Nannicini, Tommaso and Perott... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
54 Berman, Nicolas and Couttenier, Mathieu and Rohner... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
55 Nunn, Nathan and Qian, Nancy 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.