Citation Analysis

Fast Learning of Optimal Policy Trees
James Cussens, Julia Hatamyar, Vishalie Shah, Noemi Kreif
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15435
24
Citation mentions
16
Cited references
5
Sections
5,197
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Zhengyuan Zhou and Susan Athey and Stefan Wager 4 2 7.0 0.167 0.811 100%
2 3 2 5.0 0.125 0.737 100%
3 2 2 4.0 0.083 0.644 100%
4 3 1 3.0 0.125 0.585 100%
5 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
6 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
7 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
8 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
9 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
10 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
11 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
12 Gurobi Optimization, LLC 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
13 Boost C++ Libraries 1 1 2.0 0.042 0.406 100%
14 Cormen, Thomas H. and Leiserson, Charles E. and Ri... 1 1 2.0 0.042 0.406 100%
15 1 1 2.0 0.042 0.406 100%
16 van der Linden, Jacobus and de Weerdt, Mathijs and... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.042 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.