Citation Analysis

Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators: A Simulation Approach \vspace0.5cm
Jesse Zhou, Geoffrey T. Wodtke
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14019
105
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
7
Sections
12,185
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 VanderWeele, Tyler 5 3 7.0 0.048 1.000 100%
2 Wodtke, Geoffrey T and Zhou, Xiang (self) 2025 6 6 11.0 0.057 1.000 100%
3 Zhou, Xiang and Yamamoto, Teppei (self) 2023 5 3 8.0 0.048 1.000 100%
4 Wodtke, Geoffrey T and Zhou, Xiang (self) 5 3 8.0 0.048 1.000 100%
5 Wehenkel, Antoine and Louppe, Gilles 2019 7 3 13.0 0.067 1.000 100%
6 Balgi, Sourabh and Daoud, Adel and Peña, Jose M. a... (self) 2025 11 3 21.0 0.105 1.000 100%
7 VanderWeele, Tyler J and Vansteelandt, Stijn and R... 9 5 14.0 0.086 0.962 89%
8 Brader, Ted and Valentino, Nicholas A and Suhay, E... 5 4 8.0 0.048 0.928 80%
9 Wehenkel, Antoine and Louppe, Gilles 2021 5 2 9.0 0.048 0.874 100%
10 Huang, Chin-Wei and Krueger, David and Lacoste, Al... 2018 5 2 10.0 0.048 0.874 100%
11 Hayes, Andrew F 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
12 Zhou, Xiang (self) 2022 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
13 Avin, Chen and Shpitser, Ilya and Pearl, Judea 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Geneletti, Sara 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Didelez, Vanessa and Dawid, Philip and Geneletti, ... 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Pearl, Judea 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
17 Imai, Kosuke and Keele, Luke and Tingley, Dustin 2 2 2.0 0.019 0.511 50%
18 Imai, Kosuke and Yamamoto, Teppei 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
19 Zhou, Xiang and Wodtke, Geoffrey T (self) 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
20 MacKinnon, David 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Mortimer, Kathleen M and Neugebauer, Romain and va... 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Naimi, Ashley I and Moodie, Erica E M and Auger, N... 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Zhou, Xiang and Wodtke, Geoffrey T (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Diaz, Iván and Hejazi, Nima S. and Rudolph, Kara E... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Tchetgen Tchetgen 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Imai, Kosuke and Keele, Luke and Tingley, Dustin a... 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Elwert, Felix 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Pearl, Judea 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Holland, Paul W. 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Rubin, Donald B 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Nguyen, Trang Quynh and Schmid, Ian and Ogburn, El... 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Hornik, Kurt and Stinchcombe, Maxwell and White, H... 1989 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Papamakarios, George and Nalisnick, Eric and Rezen... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Balgi, Sourabh and Pen 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Uria, Benigno and Murray, Iain and Larochelle, Hug... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Ziegler, Zachary M. and Rush, Alexander M. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Clenshaw, Charles W and Curtis, Alan R 1960 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 LeCun, Yann and Bengio, Yoshua and Hinton, Geoffre... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Chollet, Francois 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Goodfellow, Ian and Bengio, Yoshua and Courville, ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Kotelchuck, M. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.