Citation Analysis

Production Function Estimation without Invertibility: Imperfectly Competitive Environments and Demand Shocks
Ulrich Doraszelski, Lixiong Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13520

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,335

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Neyman	1959	2	2	3.0	0.083	0.644	100%
2	Doraszelski \harvardand\ Jaumandreu	2024	2	2	2.5	0.083	0.511	50%
3	von Thunen	1842	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
4	Wicksteed	1894	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
5	Cobb \harvardand\ Douglas	1928	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
6	Solow	1957	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
7	Hall	1988	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
8	De Loecker \harvardand\ Warzynski	2012	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
9	Berry, Levinsohn \harvardand\ Pakes	1995	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
10	Foster, Haltiwanger \harvardand\ Syverson	2008	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
11	Biondi	2022	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
12	Ackerberg \harvardand\ De Loecker	2024	1	1	1.0	0.042	0.406	100%
13	De Loecker, Goldberg, Khandelwal \harvardand\ Pavc...	2016	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
14	Syverson	2001	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
15	Van Biesebroeck	2007	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
16	Ackerberg, Caves \harvardand\ Frazer	2015	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
17	Chirinko	2008	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
18	De Loecker \harvardand\ Syverson	2021	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
19	Aw, Roberts \harvardand\ Xu	2011	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
20	De Loecker	2013	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
21	Doraszelski \harvardand\ Jaumandreu	2013	1	1	2.0	0.042	0.406	100%
22	Doraszelski \harvardand\ Jaumandreu	2018	1	1	0.5	0.042	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.