Citation Analysis – Rethinking Distributional IVs: KAN-Powered D-IV-LATE & Model Choice

Rethinking Distributional IVs: KAN-Powered D-IV-LATE & Model Choice
Charles Shaw
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12765

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,790

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Vaidya, S., Ruehle, F., Halvers...	2024	4	4	5.5	0.105	0.928	100%
2	Kratsios, A., & Furuya, T	2025	4	4	5.5	0.105	0.928	100%
3	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du...	2018	3	3	3.5	0.079	0.843	100%
4	Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C	2004	3	3	6.0	0.079	0.843	100%
5	Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B	1996	2	2	1.5	0.053	0.644	100%
6	Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D	1994	2	2	3.0	0.053	0.644	100%
7	Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B	1997	2	2	1.5	0.053	0.644	100%
8	Abadie, A	2002	2	2	1.5	0.053	0.644	100%
9	Doksum, K	1974	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
10	Lehmann, E. L., & D'Abrera, H. J	1975	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
11	Koenker, R	2005	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
12	Firpo, S	2007	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
13	Chernozhukov, V., Fernandez-Val, I., & Melly, B	2013	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
14	Byambadalai, U., Oka, T., & Yasui, S	2024	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
15	Chen, A. S	2024	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
16	Mehendale, E., Thorat, A., Kolla, R., & Pedanekar,...	2025	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
17	Bickel, P. J., Klaassen, C. A., Ritov, Y., & Welln...	1993	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
18	Newey, W. K	1994	1	1	0.5	0.026	0.406	100%
19	Hoagland, A	2020	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%
20	Newey, W. K	1997	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%
21	Wager, S., & Athey, S	2015	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%
22	Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., & Wager, S	2019	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%
23	Peng, W., Coleman, T. and Mentch, L	2022	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%
24	Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C	2014	1	1	2.0	0.026	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Vaidya, S., Ruehle, F., Halvers...

2024

5.5

0.105

0.928

100%

Kratsios, A., & Furuya, T

2025

5.5

0.105

0.928

100%

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du...

2018

3.5

0.079

0.843

100%

Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C

2004

6.0

0.079

0.843

100%

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B

1996

1.5

0.053

0.644

100%

Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D

1994

3.0

0.053

0.644

100%

Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B

1997

1.5

0.053

0.644

100%

Abadie, A

2002

1.5

0.053

0.644

100%

Doksum, K

1974

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Lehmann, E. L., & D'Abrera, H. J

1975

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Koenker, R

2005

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Firpo, S

2007

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Chernozhukov, V., Fernandez-Val, I., & Melly, B

2013

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Byambadalai, U., Oka, T., & Yasui, S

2024

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Chen, A. S

2024

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Mehendale, E., Thorat, A., Kolla, R., & Pedanekar,...

2025

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Bickel, P. J., Klaassen, C. A., Ritov, Y., & Welln...

1993

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K

1994

0.5

0.026

0.406

100%

Hoagland, A

2020

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K

1997

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Wager, S., & Athey, S

2015

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., & Wager, S

2019

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Peng, W., Coleman, T. and Mentch, L

2022

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C

2014

2.0

0.026

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.