Citation Analysis

Fragility in Average Treatment Effect on the Treated\\ under Limited Covariate Support
Mengqi Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08950

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,406

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Crump, R. K., V. J. Hotz, G. W. Imbens, and O. A. ...	2009	2	2	2.0	0.105	0.644	100%
2	Imbens, G. and Y. Xu	2025	2	2	3.0	0.105	0.644	100%
3	Li, F., K. L. Morgan, and A. M. Zaslavsky	2018	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
4	Rosenbaum, P. R	2001	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
5	Imbens, G. W	2004	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
6	Ho, D. E., K. I. Vincent, G. King, and E. A. Stuar...	2002	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
7	Becker, S. O. and M. Caliendo		1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
8	Rothe, C	2017	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
9	Dahabreh, I. J., S. E. Robertson, J. A. Steingrims...	2020	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
10	Manski, C. F	2003	1	1	2.0	0.053	0.406	100%
11	Dehejia, R. and S. Wahba	1999	1	1	2.0	0.053	0.406	100%
12	Dehejia, R. and S. Wahba	2002	1	1	2.0	0.053	0.406	100%
13	LaLonde, R. J	1986	1	1	2.0	0.053	0.406	100%
14	King, G. and L. Zeng	2006	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
15	Rosenbaum, P. R	2002	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
16	Cinelli, C. and C. Hazlett	2020	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
17	Heckman, J. J. and J. A. Smith	1995	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.