← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

What Makes Treatment Effects Identifiable?\\ Characterizations and Estimators Beyond Unconfoundedness
Yang Cai, Alkis Kalavasis, Katerina Mamali, Anay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04194
289
Citation mentions
125
Cited references
13
Sections
14,520
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, Hansen, Kallus, Spindler, Syrgkanis 2024 7 7 11.5 0.024 1.000 100%
2 Lee, Lemieux 2010 6 3 10.5 0.021 1.000 100%
3 Cook 2008 6 3 7.5 0.021 1.000 100%
4 Crump, Hotz, Imbens, Mitnik 2009 6 4 9.0 0.021 1.000 100%
5 Li, Thomas, Li 2018 7 4 9.5 0.024 1.000 100%
6 Khan, Ugander 2024 5 4 7.0 0.017 1.000 100%
7 Kalavasis, Mehrotra, Zampetakis (self) 2024 8 4 11.5 0.028 1.000 100%
8 Tan 2006 12 5 19.0 0.042 0.971 92%
9 Rosenbaum 2002 20 8 33.0 0.069 0.966 90%
10 Kallus, Zhou 2021 7 5 12.5 0.024 0.950 86%
11 Imbens, Lemieux 2008 7 4 9.5 0.024 0.950 86%
12 Hahn, Todd, Klaauw 2001 7 4 8.0 0.024 0.950 86%
13 Rubin 1977 6 4 7.0 0.021 0.941 83%
14 Imbens, Rubin 2015 10 7 17.0 0.035 0.928 80%
15 Thistlethwaite, Campbell 1960 9 6 13.0 0.031 0.920 78%
16 Daskalakis, Kontonis, Tzamos, Zampetakis (self) 2021 6 4 7.5 0.021 0.874 67%
17 Sacks, Ylvisaker 1978 4 3 5.0 0.014 0.843 75%
18 Kearns, Schapire 1994 9 5 9.0 0.031 0.822 56%
19 Hernan, Robins 2023 4 2 6.0 0.014 0.811 100%
20 Alon, Ben-David, Cesa-Bianchi, Haussler 1997 10 5 9.5 0.035 0.794 50%
21 Rubin 1978 3 2 4.0 0.010 0.737 100%
22 Rosenbaum 1987 3 2 6.0 0.010 0.737 100%
23 Foster, Syrgkanis 2023 4 3 5.0 0.014 0.737 50%
24 Cochran 1965 2 2 1.5 0.007 0.644 100%
25 D’Amour, Ding, Feller, Lei, Sekhon 2021 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
26 Angrist, Pischke 2009 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
27 Galton 1897 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
28 Cohen 1991 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
29 Woodroofe 1985 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
30 Cohen 1950 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
31 Lai, Ying 1991 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
32 Kontonis, Tzamos, Zampetakis (self) 2019 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
33 Lee, Mehrotra, Zampetakis (self) 2024 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
34 Angrist, Lavy 1999 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
35 Klaauw 2002 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
36 Black 1999 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
37 Moscoe, Bor, Bärnighausen 2015 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
38 Rosenbaum 1991 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
39 Goldberger 1972 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
40 Rubin 1974 3 1 3.0 0.010 0.585 100%
41 Rosenbaum, Rubin 1983 2 1 2.0 0.007 0.511 100%
42 Angluin 1980 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
43 Holland 1986 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
44 Neyman 1990 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
45 Heckman 1979 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
46 Athey, Imbens 2017 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
47 Dehejia, Wahba 1998 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
48 Dehejia, Wahba 2002 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
49 Abadie, Imbens 2006 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
50 Abadie, Imbens 2016 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
51 Brunell, DiNardo 2004 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
52 Sekhon 2004 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
53 Ho, Imai, King, Stuart 2007 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
54 Morgan, Harding 2006 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
55 Lee, Valliant 2009 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
56 Oakes, Kaufman 2017 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
57 Austin 2008 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
58 Valiant 1984 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
59 Vapnik 1999 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
60 Blumer, Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, Warmuth 1989 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
61 Hastie, Tibshirani, Friedman 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
62 Anthony, Bartlett 1999 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
63 Lugosi 2002 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
64 Massart, Nédélec 2006 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
65 Vapnik 2006 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
66 Bousquet, Boucheron, Lugosi 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
67 Bousquet 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
68 Everitt, Hand 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
69 Teicher 1963 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
70 Angluin 1988 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
71 Manski 1990 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
72 Athey, Haile 2002 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
73 Talagrand 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
74 Chernozhukov, Newey, Robins 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
75 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
76 Semenova, Goldman, Chernozhukov, Taddy 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
77 Chernozhukov, Escanciano, Ichimura, Newey, Robins 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
78 Bang, Robins 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
79 Chen, Syrgkanis, Austern 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
80 Chernozhukov, Newey, Quintas-Martínez, Syrgkanis 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
81 Battocchi, Dillon, Hei, Lewis, Oprescu, Syrgkanis 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
82 Lewis, Syrgkanis 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
83 Petersen, Porter, Gruber, Wang, Van\bibnamedelimb ... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
84 Léger, Chatton, Le\bibnamedelima Borgne, Pirracchi... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
85 Cornfield, Haenszel, Hammond, Lilienfeld, Shimkin,... 1959 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
86 Rosenbaum, Rubin 1983 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
87 Nicole\bibnamedelimb Bohme\bibnamedelima Carnegie,... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
88 Oster 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
89 Zhao, Small, Bhattacharya 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
90 Jacob\bibnamedelima Dorn, Kallus 2024 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
91 Jin, Ren, Zhou 2022 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
92 Dorn, Guo 2023 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
93 Chernozhukov, Wüthrich, Zhu 2023 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
94 McCaffrey, Ridgeway, Morral 2004 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
95 Athey, Tibshirani, Wager 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
96 Westreich, Lessler, Funk 2010 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
97 Fan, Gijbels 1996 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
98 Porter 2003 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
99 Calonico, Cattaneo, Titiunik 2014 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
100 Cattaneo, Idrobo, Titiunik 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
101 Maddala 1983 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
102 Daskalakis, Gouleakis, Tzamos, Zampetakis (self) 2018 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
103 Plevrakis 2021 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
104 Fotakis, Kalavasis, Tzamos (self) 2020 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
105 Lee, Mehrotra, Zampetakis (self) 2025 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
106 Kennedy, Balakrishnan, Robins, Wasserman 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
107 Jin, Syrgkanis 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
108 Rosenbaum 1988 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
109 Lin, Psaty, Kronmal 1998 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
110 Carbery, Wright 2001 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
111 Wooldridge 2005 2 1 1.0 0.007 0.110 0%
112 Pope, Dockery 2006 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
113 Hoffman, Williams 2011 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
114 Sommer, Zeger 1991 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
115 Lee, Ellenberg, Hirtz, Nelson 1991 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
116 Sheiner, Rubin 1995 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
117 Hewitt, Torgerson, Miles 2006 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
118 Ngo, Stapleton, Syrgkanis, Wu 2021 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
119 Balke, Pearl 1997 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
120 Dillman, Smyth, Christian 2014 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
121 Groves 2005 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
122 Wager 2020 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
123 Haussler 1989 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
124 Yatracos 1985 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
125 Rudelson, Vershynin 2006 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.