← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfConventional and Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis with deaR
Vicente J. Bolos, Rafael Benitez, Vicente Coll-Serrano
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03766
156
Citation mentions
82
Cited references
10
Sections
12,438
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Simar, L\'e 1998 5 3 8.0 0.032 1.000 100%
2 Kaoru Tone 2010 5 3 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
3 Cooper, William W and Seiford, Lawrence M and Tone... 2007 4 4 7.0 0.026 0.928 100%
4 Tone, Kaoru 2001 5 2 10.0 0.032 0.874 100%
5 Guo, Peijun and Tanaka, Hideo 2001 6 2 12.0 0.038 0.874 100%
6 Rolf Fa 1978 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
7 Kao, Chiang and Liu, Shiang Tai 2003 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
8 Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. 1978 4 2 6.0 0.026 0.811 100%
9 Cooper, William W. and Park, Kyung Sam and Pastor,... 1999 4 2 6.0 0.026 0.811 100%
10 Tone, Kaoru 2002 4 2 8.0 0.026 0.811 100%
11 John Doyle and Rodney Green 1994 4 2 8.0 0.026 0.811 100%
12 Zhu, Joe 2014 3 2 4.0 0.019 0.737 100%
13 Banker, R. D. and Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. 1984 3 2 5.0 0.019 0.737 100%
14 Rolf Fa 1994 3 2 5.0 0.019 0.737 100%
15 Aparicio, Juan and Ruiz, Jose L. and Sirvent, Inma... 2007 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
16 Le\'o 2003 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
17 Fa 1997 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
18 Grifell-Tatj\'e 1999 5 1 10.0 0.032 0.693 100%
19 Cooper, William W. and Park, Kyung Sam and Pastor,... 2001 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Charnes, A and Cooper, W.W and Golany, B and Seifo... 1985 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Du, Juan and Liang, Liang and Zhu, Joe 2010 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Robert G. Chambers and Yangho Chung and Rolf Färe 1996 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
23 Chambers, R G and Chung, Y and F\"a 1998 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
24 Joe Zhu 1996 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
25 Robert M. Thrall 1999 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
26 Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. 1962 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
27 Wu, Jie and Tsai, Henry and Zhou, Zhixiang 2011 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
28 Coelli, Timothy J. and Rao, Dodla Sai Prasada and ... 2005 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
29 M C A Silva Portela and E Thanassoulis and G Simps... 2004 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
30 Andersen, Per and Petersen, Niels Christian 1993 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
31 Chiang Kao and Shiang-Tai Liu 2000 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
32 C Kao and S-Tai Liu 2000 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
33 Sungmook Lim and Joe Zhu 2015 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
34 Cinzia Daraio and Leopold Simar 2007 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
35 A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes 1979 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
36 Mamizadeh-Chatghayeh, Somayeh and Sanei, Masoud 2013 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
37 Lawrence M. Seiford and Joe Zhu 2002 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
38 Subhash C. Ray and Evangelia Desli 1997 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
39 Ali Emrouznejad and Guo-Liang Yang 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Daraio, Cinzia and Kerstens, Kristiaan H.J. and Ne... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Alvarez, Inmaculada C. and Barbero, Javier and Zof... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Coelli, Timothy J. 1996 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Paul W. Wilson 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Peter Bogetoft and Lars Otto 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Peter Bogetoft and Lars Otto 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Dong-Hyun Oh and with Dukrok Suh 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Dong-Joon Lim 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Wade D. Cook and Liang Liang and Joe Zhu 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Chiang Kao 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Ali Emrouznejad and Emmanuel Thanassoulis 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Andreas Diomedes Soteriades 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 William W. Cooper and Jesús T. Pastor and Fernando... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 C.A. Knox Lovell 1995 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Jaak Simm and Galina Besstremyannaya 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Léopold Simar and Paul W. Wilson 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Vicente Coll-Serrano and Vicente J. Bolos and Rafa... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Michel Berkelaar and others 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Cook, Wade D. and Zhu, Joe 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Lim, Sungmook and Zhu, Joe 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 F\ 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. 1981 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Laurens Cherchye and Timo Kousmanen and Thierry Po... 2000 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Deprins, Dominique and Simar, Leopold and Tulkens,... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Briec, W. 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Qingyuan Zhu and Jie Wu and Xiang Ji and Feng Li 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Charnes, A and Cooper, W.W and Thrall R.M 1991 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Ruggiero, John 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Tone, Kaoru 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Kaoru Tone 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Rolf Fa 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Hua, Zhongsheng and Bian, Yiwen 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Golany, B. and Roll, Y. 1989 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Ole B. Olesen and Niels Christian Petersen 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Adel Hatami-Marbini and Ali Emrouznejad and Madjid... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Emrouznejad, Ali and Tavana, Madjid and Hatami-Mar... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Shestalova, Victoria 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Jesús T. Pastor and C.A. Knox Lovell 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Wang, Ying Ming and Lan, Yi Xin 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 Bernard W. Silverman 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Battese, George E and Rao, D. S. Prasada 2002 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 George E. Battese and D. S. Prasada Rao and Christ... 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
82 Tiedemann, Torben and Francksen, Tammo and Latacz-... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.