Citation Analysis

Get me out of this hole: a profile likelihood approach to identifying and avoiding inferior local optima in choice models
Stephane Hess, David Bunch, Andrew Daly
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02722

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,177

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	McCullough, B. D. and Vinod, H. D.	2003	6	2	8.0	0.261	0.874	100%
2	Bunch, David S. (self)	2024	3	2	4.0	0.130	0.737	100%
3	Stephane Hess and David Palma (self)	2019	2	2	3.0	0.087	0.644	100%
4	Daly, A.J. and Hess, S. and de Jong, G. (self)	2012	2	2	4.0	0.087	0.644	100%
5	T. Amemiya	1985	1	1	1.0	0.043	0.406	100%
6	Bierlaire, Michel and The	2010	1	1	1.0	0.043	0.406	100%
7	K. Train	2009	1	1	1.0	0.043	0.406	100%
8	P. Armstrong and R. A. Garrido and \relax J.\space...	2001	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
9	K. W. Axhausen and S. Hess and A. Ko (self)	2008	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
10	K. Train and M. Weeks	2005	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
11	Sobol, Ilya Meerovich	1967	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
12	Bunch, David S. and Gay, David M. and Welsch, Roy ... (self)	1993	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
13	Moshe Ben-Akiva and Joffre Swait	1986	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
14	Davidson, Russell. and MacKinnon, James G.	1993	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.