← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfNonparametric \textquotedblleft rich covariates\textquotedblright \vspace-12pt
Ludgero Glorias, Federico Martellosio, J. M. C. Santos Silva
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21213
193
Citation mentions
49
Cited references
10
Sections
7,886
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Abadie, A. 2003 7 5 13.0 0.036 1.000 100%
2 Kolesár, M. 2013 7 3 10.0 0.036 1.000 100%
3 Mogstad, M. and Torgovitsky, A. 2024 6 4 9.0 0.031 1.000 100%
4 Lee, M.-J. 2021 15 6 27.0 0.078 1.000 100%
5 Kim, B. and Lee, M.-J. 2024 13 5 24.0 0.067 1.000 100%
6 Lee, M.-J. and Han, C. 2024 6 3 11.0 0.031 1.000 100%
7 Chernozhukov, V. and Chetverikov, D. and Demirer, ... 2018 22 6 41.0 0.114 1.000 100%
8 7 4 11.0 0.036 1.000 100%
9 Blandhol, C. and Bonney, J. and Mogstad, M. and To... 2025 27 8 48.0 0.140 0.988 96%
10 4 3 7.0 0.021 0.928 100%
11 Newey, W. K and McFadden, D. L. 1994 4 4 7.0 0.021 0.928 100%
12 Blandhol, C. and Bonney, J. and Mogstad, M. and To... 2022 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
13 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
14 Angrist, J. D. and Imbens, G. W. 1995 4 2 5.0 0.021 0.811 100%
15 Farrell, M. H. and Liang, T. and Misra, S. 2021 4 2 8.0 0.021 0.811 100%
16 Imbens, G. W. and Angrist, J. D. 1994 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
17 3 2 6.0 0.016 0.737 100%
18 Bach, F. 2017 3 2 6.0 0.016 0.737 100%
19 Schmidt-Hieber, J. 2020 3 2 6.0 0.016 0.737 100%
20 Kohler, M. and Langer, S. 2021 3 2 6.0 0.016 0.737 100%
21 Braun, A. and Kohler, M. and Langer, S. and Walk, ... 2024 3 2 6.0 0.016 0.737 100%
22 8 1 16.0 0.041 0.693 100%
23 Bauer, B. and Kohler, M. 2019 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
24 Ahrens, A. and Hansen, C. B. and Schaffer, M. E. 2023 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
25 3 1 6.0 0.016 0.585 100%
26 Newey, W. K. 1994 3 1 6.0 0.016 0.585 100%
27 Ahrens, A. and Hansen, C. B. and Schaffer, M. E. a... 2024 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
28 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
29 Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
30 Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
31 Angrist, J. D. and Graddy, K. and Imbens, G. W. 2000 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
32 Mogstad, M. and Torgovitsky, A. and Walters, C. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
33 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
34 Pagan, A. 1984 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Murphy, K. M. and Topel, R. H. 1985 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Robinson, P. 1988 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Newey, W. K. 1997 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
38 Newey, W. K. and Hsieh, F. and Robins, J. M. 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Barron, A. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Pedregosa, F. and Varoquaux, G. and Gramfort, A. a... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Chen, X. and White, H. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Nadaraya, E. A. 1964 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Watson, G. 1964 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Scott, David W 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Qi Gao and Long Liu and Jeffrey S. Racine 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Kinal, T. 1980 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.