← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

From What Ifs to Insights: \\ Counterfactuals in Causal Inference vs. Explainable AI
Galit Shmueli, David Martens, Jaewon Yoo, Travis Greene
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13324
58
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
5
Sections
2,973
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., and Russell, C 2017 5 3 10.0 0.086 1.000 100%
2 Xu, K., Chan, J., Ghose, A., and Han, S. P 2017 3 3 4.5 0.052 0.737 67%
3 Dickerman, B. A. and Hernan, M. A 2020 2 2 4.0 0.034 0.644 100%
4 Martens, D. and Provost, F (self) 2014 2 2 4.0 0.034 0.644 100%
5 Guidotti, R 2022 2 2 4.0 0.034 0.644 100%
6 Karimi, A.-H., Barthe, G., Scholkopf, B., and Vale... 2022 2 2 4.0 0.034 0.644 100%
7 Glymour, M., Pearl, J., and Jewell, N. P 2016 2 1 4.0 0.034 0.511 100%
8 Pearl, J. and Mackenzie, D 2018 2 1 4.0 0.034 0.511 100%
9 Rubin, D. B 1974 2 2 2.5 0.034 0.511 50%
10 Pearl, J 2009 2 1 4.0 0.034 0.511 100%
11 Goldfarb, A. and Tucker, C 2011 2 2 2.5 0.034 0.511 50%
12 Flammer, C. and Kacperczyk, A 2016 2 2 2.5 0.034 0.511 50%
13 Tirunillai, S. and Tellis, G. J 2017 2 2 2.5 0.034 0.511 50%
14 Shmueli, G (self) 2010 1 1 1.0 0.017 0.406 100%
15 Sjolander, A 2012 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
16 Lewis, D 1973 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
17 Fernández-Loría, C., Provost, F., and Han, X 2020 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
18 Gordon, B. R., Zettelmeyer, F., Bhargava, N., and ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
19 Tolomei, G., Silvestri, F., Haines, A., and Lalmas... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
20 Holland, P. W 1986 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
21 Venkatasubramanian, S. and Alfano, M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
22 Hofman, J. M., Watts, D. J., Athey, S., Garip, F.,... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
23 Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B 2015 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
24 Acharya, A., Blackwell, M., and Sen, M 2016 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
25 Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., and Yamamoto, T 2011 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
26 Abadie, A. and Gardeazabal, J 2003 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
27 Flammer, C 2015 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
28 Verma, S., Boonsanong, V., Hoang, M., Hines, K. E.... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
29 Sokol, K. and Flach, P 2020 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
30 Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J., Russell, C., and Silva,... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
31 Goethals, S., Martens, D., and Calders, T (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
32 Schnabel, T., Swaminathan, A., Singh, A., Chandak,... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
33 Bottou, L., Peters, J., Quinonero-Candela, J., Cha... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
34 DeRubeis, R. J., Cohen, Z. D., Forand, N. R., Four... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
35 Oberst, M. and Sontag, D 2019 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
36 Prosperi, M., Guo, Y., Sperrin, M., Koopman, J. S.... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
37 Komorowski, M., Celi, L. A., Badawi, O., Gordon, A... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
38 Joachims, T., London, B., Su, Y., Swaminathan, A.,... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
39 Gottesman, O., Futoma, J., Liu, Y., Parbhoo, S., C... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.017 0.406 100%
40 Stock, J. H. and Yogo, M 2002 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.087 0%
41 Lee, D. S., McCrary, J., Moreira, M. J., and Porte... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.017 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.