Citation Analysis

Better Understanding Triple Differences Estimators
Marcelo Ortiz-Villavicencio, Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09942
153
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
10
Sections
12,930
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hansen and Wingender 2023 17 3 31.0 0.111 1.000 100%
2 Olden and M\oen 2022 8 5 13.0 0.052 1.000 100%
3 Cai 2016 14 3 26.0 0.092 1.000 100%
4 Cui, Zhang and Zheng 2018 15 3 29.0 0.098 1.000 100%
5 Strezhnev 2023 5 3 7.0 0.033 1.000 100%
6 Callaway and Sant’Anna (self) 2021 22 11 39.5 0.144 0.985 95%
7 Sant'Anna and Zhao (self) 2020 12 6 19.5 0.078 0.909 75%
8 Baker, Callaway, Cunningham, Goodman-Bacon and San... (self) 2025 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
9 Abadie 2005 3 3 6.0 0.020 0.843 100%
10 Wooldridge 2021 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
11 Borusyak, Jaravel and Spiess 2024 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
12 Roth, Sant'Anna, Bilinski and Poe (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
13 Rambachan and Roth 2023 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
14 De Chaisemartin and d’Haultfoeuille 2020 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
15 Sun and Abraham 2021 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
16 Ahrens, Chernozhukov, Hansen, Kozbur, Schaffer and... 2025 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
17 Newey and McFadden 1994 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.511 50%
18 Kang and Schafer 2007 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.511 50%
19 Chiu, Lan, Liu and Xu 2025 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
20 Gruber 1994 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
21 Antwi, Moriya and Simon 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
22 Walker 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
23 Garthwaite, Gross and Notowidigdo 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
24 Alsan and Wanamaker 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Patnaik 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Bailey, Helgerman and Stuart 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Goodman-Bacon 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Słoczyński 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Słoczyński 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Caron 2025 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Robins 1986 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Khan and Tamer 2010 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Abbring and van den Berg 2003 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Malani and Reif 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Mogstad and Torgovitsky 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 De Chaisemartin and d’Haultfoeuille 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Lechner 2002 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Heckman, Ichimura and Todd 1997 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Seaman and Vansteelandt 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Wooldridge 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 van der Vaart 1998 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Na... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Sant'Anna and Xu (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Chen, Sant'Anna and Xie (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Jun and Lee 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Newey 1990 3 1 1.5 0.020 0.126 0%
49 Hahn 1998 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
50 Chen, Hong and Tarozzi 2008 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.