← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Assumption-robust Causal Inference
Aditya Ghosh, Dominik Rothenhäusler
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08729
85
Citation mentions
63
Cited references
10
Sections
8,423
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 6 4 12.0 0.071 1.000 100%
2 3 3 5.0 0.035 0.843 100%
3 James M. Robins and Andrea Rotnitzky and Lue Ping ... 1994 3 3 6.0 0.035 0.843 100%
4 4 2 6.0 0.047 0.811 100%
5 4 2 8.0 0.047 0.811 100%
6 Robins, James M and Rotnitzky, Andrea 1995 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
7 Scharfstein, Daniel O and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Ro... 1999 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 4 3 3.5 0.047 0.585 25%
9 Hainmueller, Jens 2012 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
10 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
11 Huang, Jiali and Sang, Guoyuan and Chao, Tzuyang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
12 Peng Ding and Luke W. Miratrix 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
13 Splawa-Neyman, Jerzy 1990 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Rubin, Donald B 1977 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, Jo 2009 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Imbens, Guido W. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Dylan S. Small and Zhiqiang Tan and Roland R. Rams... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson 1952 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Jean-Claude Deville and Carl-Erik Särndal 1992 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Fan Li and Kari Lock Morgan and Alan M. Zaslavsky 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Sara Steegen and Francis Tuerlinckx and Andrew Gel... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Box, George EP 1980 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Skene, AM and Shaw, JEH and Lee, TD 1986 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Leamer, Edward E 1983 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Robert J. LaLonde 1986 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Rosenbaum, Paul R 1987 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Bin Yu 2013 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Yu, Bin and Kumbier, Karl 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Jeong, Yujin and Rothenha 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 David A. Freedman 1991 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Rosenbaum, Paul R 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Karmakar, Bikram and French, Benjamin and Small, D... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Cornfield, Jerome and Haenszel, William and Hammon... 1959 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin 1983 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 James M. Robins 1999 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Kenneth A. Frank 2000 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Imbens, Guido W 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Brumback, Babette A and Herna 2004 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Kosuke Imai and Luke Keele and Teppei Yamamoto 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Carrie A. Hosman and Ben B. Hansen and Paul W. Hol... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 VanderWeele, Tyler J and Arah, Onyebuchi A 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Blackwell, Matthew 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
47 Dorie, Vincent and Harada, Masataka and Carnegie, ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
48 Cinelli, Carlos and Hazlett, Chad 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
49 Emily Oster 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
50 Zhao, Qingyuan and Small, Dylan S. and Bhattachary... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
51 AlexanderM. Franks and Alexander D’Amour and Avi F... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
52 Jacob Dorn and Kevin Guo 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
53 Kang, Hyunseung and Guo, Zijian and Liu, Zhonghua ... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
54 Jacob Dorn and Kevin Guo and Nathan Kallus 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
55 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
56 Stefan Wager and Susan Athey 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
57 Susan Athey and Julie Tibshirani and Stefan Wager 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
58 Breiman, Leo 2001 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
59 Hainmueller, Jens and Mummolo, Jonathan and Xu, Yi... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
61 2 2 1.0 0.024 0.139 0%
62 P. K. Andersen and R. D. Gill 1982 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
63 Gupta, Suyash and Rothenh\"a 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.